DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post - Support the Hanafi Fiqh Channel in youtube

**LorencoLoricelli** · 05-09-2012, 12:16 PM

And this coming from a Brother who is a Shafi'.

Masha'Allah!

My comment certainly is not directed towards brother NeednoName.

It puzzles me from time to time that a few of our Muslim brothers/sisters who do no accept differences among madzhab's opinion and would push forward his/her madzhab standpoints as the 'de-facto' opinion over some issues. I guess this is perhaps coming from lack of exposure towards Muslims of other madzhabs in their encounters? (please note that this is not about jumping between madzhabs in order to get the easiest opinion, but rather about trying to enforce a Maliki opinion to a Muslim who adheres to Hambali fiqh, for example).

All madzhabs have their own methodology in verifying if one opinion is right or not. So rather than arguing on the outcome, wouldn't it better to actually discuss (as against arguing) the process stages involved before an opinion is reached? It's more like the quality assurance process where every stage of a service or product is scrutinized. Then we all

will reach an understanding on why and how the opinion is reached. That

would not result in some arguments that only touch on a surface of a ruling, like what usually happenes here. Might not reach the same verdict, but then

would increase our understading of how the opinion is processed and all the dalils (and dalil classifications) behind it. And definitely way much better than arguing.

Allah Knows Best.

05-09-2012, 12:16 PM	#5
LorencoLoricelli Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 467 Senior Member	And this coming from a Brother who is a Shafi'. Masha'Allah! My comment certainly is not directed towards brother NeednoName. It puzzles me from time to time that a few of our Muslim brothers/sisters who do no accept differences among madzhab's opinion and would push forward his/her madzhab standpoints as the 'de-facto' opinion over some issues. I guess this is perhaps coming from lack of exposure towards Muslims of other madzhabs in their encounters? (please note that this is not about jumping between madzhabs in order to get the easiest opinion, but rather about trying to enforce a Maliki opinion to a Muslim who adheres to Hambali fiqh, for example). All madzhabs have their own methodology in verifying if one opinion is right or not. So rather than arguing on the outcome, wouldn't it better to actually discuss (as against arguing) the process stages involved before an opinion is reached? It's more like the quality assurance process where every stage of a service or product is scrutinized. Then we all will reach an understanding on why and how the opinion is reached. That would not result in some arguments that only touch on a surface of a ruling, like what usually happenes here. Might not reach the same verdict, but then would increase our understading of how the opinion is processed and all the dalils (and dalil classifications) behind it. And definitely way much better than arguing. Allah Knows Best.
	Quote