DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**perhilzit** · 05-24-2012, 08:32 PM

Obviously this thread has been opened due to some previous contention or dissatisfaction. As this has not been mentioned- probably wisely- it is diifuclt for anyone to understand where this thread is headed or what the point being made, is.

The very reason which does not allow me to elaborate further i.e. getting shot down, attacked, etc here is one (not the one and only) of the reasons of this thread.

This is the mentality, which I am pointing out, that we witness on a daily basis whether it is after Salah on the Masjid pavement, over tea with friends, in a discussion, and also online on places such as SF.

By your own admission, it is an attack? Albeit on a few individuals?

(Btw, your previous threads were not all deleted; one was moved to the Sensitive section and an explanation was provided.) Perhaps, I worded it poorly or did not double-check what I had written. I would not define it as an attack - more of a critical analysis. However, in the context of SF and the emotions of SF-members who would regard all of the above as an "attack", hence this word was used - albeit wrong.

====

The point being made is:

Why do some believe that 'ulama are beyond reproach? Do they believe 'ulama are masoom/infallible?
Is this above mentality, a mentality which was supported and propagated by the Salaf as well as our akabirin of Deoband?

05-24-2012, 08:32 PM	#12
perhilzit Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 368 Senior Member	Obviously this thread has been opened due to some previous contention or dissatisfaction. As this has not been mentioned- probably wisely- it is diifuclt for anyone to understand where this thread is headed or what the point being made, is. The very reason which does not allow me to elaborate further i.e. getting shot down, attacked, etc here is one (not the one and only) of the reasons of this thread. This is the mentality, which I am pointing out, that we witness on a daily basis whether it is after Salah on the Masjid pavement, over tea with friends, in a discussion, and also online on places such as SF. By your own admission, it is an attack? Albeit on a few individuals? (Btw, your previous threads were not all deleted; one was moved to the Sensitive section and an explanation was provided.) Perhaps, I worded it poorly or did not double-check what I had written. I would not define it as an attack - more of a critical analysis. However, in the context of SF and the emotions of SF-members who would regard all of the above as an "attack", hence this word was used - albeit wrong. ==== The point being made is: Why do some believe that 'ulama are beyond reproach? Do they believe 'ulama are masoom/infallible? Is this above mentality, a mentality which was supported and propagated by the Salaf as well as our akabirin of Deoband?
	Quote