DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**Cuccuccaltefe** · 04-30-2008, 11:34 PM

I apologise if I have become personal. It's not right and I'm sorry.

You have to see though that your posts are quite disdainful as well, with personal comments about other people. It is not halal even if you feel you are on the 'good Muslim' end of the boxing ring.

My numerous questions to people have also been unanswered. I'm sure you don;t have time to go through all my posts and see where and what these are.

I care to disagree. My posts didn't have anything personal about anyone. I mentioned Shaykh Hamza and Shaykh Abdul Hakim Murad with their respected titles, and highlighted some concerns about their views. I'm sure you're aware that many of our respected and honoured shuyukh, including Shaykh Nuh Ha Mim Keller, are not in favour of Fiqh al-Aqalliyyat.

I then mentioned Shaykh Mumisa, whose views cannot be condoned by anyone. There is ample precedent to make such comments from the way and habit of the pious and Ulama of this Ummah. I also find it strange that you attack me but cannot clarify the comments of Mumisa regarding the Quran.

Also, none of your previous posts address my concerns.

While you're on the issues of the media, care to consider why the rules for media persons includes a clause stating they should avoid kickbacks. Writers and reporters are asked not to take cash from official sources.

That might help you understand why a whole large number of Ulama avoid government funding, insha Allah. If the fourth-estate avoid official funding, then why not the Ulama whose role is even more important.

04-30-2008, 11:34 PM	#39
Cuccuccaltefe Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 561 Senior Member	I apologise if I have become personal. It's not right and I'm sorry. You have to see though that your posts are quite disdainful as well, with personal comments about other people. It is not halal even if you feel you are on the 'good Muslim' end of the boxing ring. My numerous questions to people have also been unanswered. I'm sure you don;t have time to go through all my posts and see where and what these are. I care to disagree. My posts didn't have anything personal about anyone. I mentioned Shaykh Hamza and Shaykh Abdul Hakim Murad with their respected titles, and highlighted some concerns about their views. I'm sure you're aware that many of our respected and honoured shuyukh, including Shaykh Nuh Ha Mim Keller, are not in favour of Fiqh al-Aqalliyyat. I then mentioned Shaykh Mumisa, whose views cannot be condoned by anyone. There is ample precedent to make such comments from the way and habit of the pious and Ulama of this Ummah. I also find it strange that you attack me but cannot clarify the comments of Mumisa regarding the Quran. Also, none of your previous posts address my concerns. While you're on the issues of the media, care to consider why the rules for media persons includes a clause stating they should avoid kickbacks. Writers and reporters are asked not to take cash from official sources. That might help you understand why a whole large number of Ulama avoid government funding, insha Allah. If the fourth-estate avoid official funding, then why not the Ulama whose role is even more important.
	Quote