DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**kHy87gPC** · 04-07-2012, 03:59 AM

You have no idea what you're talking about. The khilafah is not democratic. If it was, you're just providing more fodder for the Shi'as since 'Ali didn't "vote" for Abu Bakr . Was he a disenfranchised voter? The shoora is not the electorate.

Democracy isn't one rigid system of government. The democratic government of UK is different to that of the USA, both of which are different to that of Germany.

Islamic also has a different form of democracy. Doesn't mean fodder for the shias as the system they propose is that of a kind of monarchy whereas as demonstrated the Islamic system is democracy, well atleast before yazeed it was.

Was Imam Hussain not fighting for Democracy (i.e. right for the ummah to choose) or was he(RA) fighting for his own kingship? I think the former myself.

salam

04-07-2012, 03:59 AM	#16
kHy87gPC Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 505 Senior Member	You have no idea what you're talking about. The khilafah is not democratic. If it was, you're just providing more fodder for the Shi'as since 'Ali didn't "vote" for Abu Bakr . Was he a disenfranchised voter? The shoora is not the electorate. Democracy isn't one rigid system of government. The democratic government of UK is different to that of the USA, both of which are different to that of Germany. Islamic also has a different form of democracy. Doesn't mean fodder for the shias as the system they propose is that of a kind of monarchy whereas as demonstrated the Islamic system is democracy, well atleast before yazeed it was. Was Imam Hussain not fighting for Democracy (i.e. right for the ummah to choose) or was he(RA) fighting for his own kingship? I think the former myself. salam
	Quote