Thread: Democrasia
View Single Post
Old 04-07-2012, 02:54 PM   #24
Eujacwta

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
439
Senior Member
Default
Since the hadith talks about kingship, rule by force, etc coming after khilafah, then to me this means khilafah cannot be a rule by force or a rule by kingship. Definition by negation.
Assalamu Alaikum

I think if you ask the scholars they will tell you that this use of 'khilafah' refers to true Caliphate.

They would mostly still tell you to obey the Muslim ruler who calls himself Caliph but rules by force - like was the case with the Ummayads, Abbasids and Ottomans, so long as he is already established, supports Islam to at least the minimum extent that he must as ruler of a Muslim country and has taken the oath of allegiance from the Muslim masses.

They were Caliphs of a sort (but apart from a few like Umar Ibn Abdul Aziz (ra) they were not rightly guided Caliphs and their rule was essentially that of kingship not that of khilafat, yet with most of these Caliph-Kings (so long as they claimed to support Ahlus Sunnah) the Ulema generally gave them support in their continued rule and in Sunni mosques of east and west they were prayed for at Juma.
Eujacwta is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:33 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity