DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**Qxsumehj** · 04-15-2012, 04:01 AM

i'm not going to comment on this because positive comments about Pakistan leads to deletion of posts and even whole threads.

legitimate rulers????? What made them legitimate?? because they had the biggest armies? the bigger stick? favoured/supplied by the kuffar west?

Did the forefathers of these "legitimate rulers" not themselves fight others who could be described as the legitimate rulers of their own lands, which these rulers conquered or were given.

People like zardari and other leaders are first chosen by their own peers i.e. politicians, most of the time decomcracies don't vote for the immediate leader rather they choose the party to vote e.g. conservative or labour in UK. If david cameron (current uk PM) resigns now, there will be no national election for next PM, rather the conservative party will decide their next leader and s/he will become next PM.

In an Islamic democracy it will be a one party system, so people like zardari don't have a chance.

salam

They are legitimate because they have power. It's stated right there in aqida tahawiyya, the most basic text of aqida, that it is categorically HARAM to rebel against the ruler. There are countless wisdoms for this being the case.

The fact remains that the arab monarchies are still more 'religious' or at least traditional, than any muslim democracy, like egypt or pakistan, where modern moral and social corruption is widespread.

04-15-2012, 04:01 AM	#36
Qxsumehj Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 427 Senior Member	i'm not going to comment on this because positive comments about Pakistan leads to deletion of posts and even whole threads. legitimate rulers????? What made them legitimate?? because they had the biggest armies? the bigger stick? favoured/supplied by the kuffar west? Did the forefathers of these "legitimate rulers" not themselves fight others who could be described as the legitimate rulers of their own lands, which these rulers conquered or were given. People like zardari and other leaders are first chosen by their own peers i.e. politicians, most of the time decomcracies don't vote for the immediate leader rather they choose the party to vote e.g. conservative or labour in UK. If david cameron (current uk PM) resigns now, there will be no national election for next PM, rather the conservative party will decide their next leader and s/he will become next PM. In an Islamic democracy it will be a one party system, so people like zardari don't have a chance. salam They are legitimate because they have power. It's stated right there in aqida tahawiyya, the most basic text of aqida, that it is categorically HARAM to rebel against the ruler. There are countless wisdoms for this being the case. The fact remains that the arab monarchies are still more 'religious' or at least traditional, than any muslim democracy, like egypt or pakistan, where modern moral and social corruption is widespread.
	Quote