DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**ORDERCHEAPVIAGRASOFTWARE** · 04-26-2012, 12:23 AM

Even if we accept the view within the Maliki school that the saliva is not impure, how do we explain the fact that according to all the Ulama (scholars) within the Maliki school the keeping of dogs as pets is reprehensible, it says in the fatwa.

But go on, make up your own Islam.

Wassalam.

brother.

I object to your reply "But go on, make up your own Islam". Rather I would suggest something along the line "study more about the fatwa". There's no need for a provocation as everyone here is *discussing* not *arguing*. It would be different if a rafidhi coming here trying to spread their aqeedah of infallible imams, for example. Then we are obliged to defend our aqeedah. But this is a discussion among sunnis, not between a sunni and a quranist.

Allah Knows Best.

04-26-2012, 12:23 AM	#10
ORDERCHEAPVIAGRASOFTWARE Join Date Nov 2005 Posts 437 Senior Member	Even if we accept the view within the Maliki school that the saliva is not impure, how do we explain the fact that according to all the Ulama (scholars) within the Maliki school the keeping of dogs as pets is reprehensible, it says in the fatwa. But go on, make up your own Islam. Wassalam. brother. I object to your reply "But go on, make up your own Islam". Rather I would suggest something along the line "study more about the fatwa". There's no need for a provocation as everyone here is discussing not arguing. It would be different if a rafidhi coming here trying to spread their aqeedah of infallible imams, for example. Then we are obliged to defend our aqeedah. But this is a discussion among sunnis, not between a sunni and a quranist. Allah Knows Best.
	Quote