[Abnorttrano]

I gave you biographies from CLASSICAL books that doesn't mention Imam Abu Hanifah had taken from Imam Ja'far al-Sadiq despite their commentaries being elaborate as to who they taken from and who had taken from them, what have i done other than it? made an opinion from my own pocket? if that's what you think then that is your problem. I don't have to prove anything to you either. I didn't make that claim that he studied under him it was you along with claims of contemporary Scholars.

And please keep the straw man argument to yourself, that they had full islamic historical documents, what did al-Hafiz and al-Dhahabi have? absolute red herring, please keep it to yourself.

Shaykh Taha Karaan answers this well:
It is true that Imam Abu Hanifah does narrate some ahadith from Imam Ja’far as-Sadiq. But that was according to the habit of the ‘ulama to narrate from even their contemporaries. So i would say that they were contemporaries nothing else and they benefited from each other, just the way Malik and Abu Hanifah did.

And can you answer my question:

If by exchanging a few Ahadith and 'Ilm means that he was his teacher, then what is stopping us from saying Imam Muhammad Bin al-Hasan al-Shaybani was Imam Abu Hanifah's teacher? because it is known that they (the students of Imam Hanifah) would also bring ahadith and Aqwal of the 'Ulama to their Majalis al-'Ilm