DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**brandiweb** · 02-15-2010, 05:16 PM

How is one not to get emotional, when he sees brothers getting demolished with such lies and accusations? The Ahbash have had accusations flung at them that cannot even be attributed to them with proof?

I have even seen accusations been thrown at this righteous man which are sayings of the leaders of the 4 schools. Espicially of his rlayings of Imam Malik radiAllaahu 3anhu's teachings. Here you go:

http://www.masabih.org/showpost.php?p=6941&postcount=19

So from the commentary on aqeedat tahawiyah:

However, depending on the situation, every individual is mentioned accordingly. The Prophet (salla-llâhu ^alayhi wasallam) mentioned that one of his Companions would be in Hell for having taken from the spoils unrightfully (al-Bukhâriyy): “’innahû fi nnâr”. Similarly, the Prophet (salla-llâhu ^alayhi wasallam) sent after a Companion, who, three times, said: 'I am eating'. The Prophet (salla-llâhu ^alayhi wasallam) said “lâ ‘ashba^a-llâhu batnah”. It means: "May Allâhnot fill is stomach!" (Muslim). The religious obligation dictates warning the Muslims against prohibited actions. Hence, the scholars of Hadîth mentioned such hadîths about these sinful Companions. This does not blemish the fine qualities which the Companions had at large. The second hadith is about Mu'awiyah (ra) and he intends by it to attack him (ra) whereas if you pick up the books of shurooh, this actually is a fadhail of his. I can give you for example the hadith of the Prophet (saw) where he said that one of you will fight for the ta'weel (interpretation) of the Qur'an, and immediately Abu Bakr (Ra) and 'Umar (ra) jumped up that it might be them while 'Ali (ra) was just tying a shoe. Does this make 'Ali (ra) look bad? If you finish the hadith, the Prophet (saw) explained that it will be 'Ali (ra). Any isolated narration, or isolated version can be used by Ahlul Bid'a, whether Nawasib, Rafidha or now, the Ahbash - but the explanations of Ahlul bid'a aren't worth their weight in ink. In the same books, Rasulallah (saw) is recorded as blessing anybody he's insulted, so even if we take the meaning as negative, you have nothing whereas the fadhail of Ameer Mu'awiyah (ra) are well known such as his insistence on the navy of the Muslims that the Prophet (saw) predicted.

Does it satisfy you Habashi to be with those who attack a man when the dirt that he steps on is worth more than your life?

02-15-2010, 05:16 PM	#23
brandiweb Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 509 Senior Member	How is one not to get emotional, when he sees brothers getting demolished with such lies and accusations? The Ahbash have had accusations flung at them that cannot even be attributed to them with proof? I have even seen accusations been thrown at this righteous man which are sayings of the leaders of the 4 schools. Espicially of his rlayings of Imam Malik radiAllaahu 3anhu's teachings. Here you go: http://www.masabih.org/showpost.php?p=6941&postcount=19 So from the commentary on aqeedat tahawiyah: However, depending on the situation, every individual is mentioned accordingly. The Prophet (salla-llâhu ^alayhi wasallam) mentioned that one of his Companions would be in Hell for having taken from the spoils unrightfully (al-Bukhâriyy): “’innahû fi nnâr”. Similarly, the Prophet (salla-llâhu ^alayhi wasallam) sent after a Companion, who, three times, said: 'I am eating'. The Prophet (salla-llâhu ^alayhi wasallam) said “lâ ‘ashba^a-llâhu batnah”. It means: "May Allâhnot fill is stomach!" (Muslim). The religious obligation dictates warning the Muslims against prohibited actions. Hence, the scholars of Hadîth mentioned such hadîths about these sinful Companions. This does not blemish the fine qualities which the Companions had at large. The second hadith is about Mu'awiyah (ra) and he intends by it to attack him (ra) whereas if you pick up the books of shurooh, this actually is a fadhail of his. I can give you for example the hadith of the Prophet (saw) where he said that one of you will fight for the ta'weel (interpretation) of the Qur'an, and immediately Abu Bakr (Ra) and 'Umar (ra) jumped up that it might be them while 'Ali (ra) was just tying a shoe. Does this make 'Ali (ra) look bad? If you finish the hadith, the Prophet (saw) explained that it will be 'Ali (ra). Any isolated narration, or isolated version can be used by Ahlul Bid'a, whether Nawasib, Rafidha or now, the Ahbash - but the explanations of Ahlul bid'a aren't worth their weight in ink. In the same books, Rasulallah (saw) is recorded as blessing anybody he's insulted, so even if we take the meaning as negative, you have nothing whereas the fadhail of Ameer Mu'awiyah (ra) are well known such as his insistence on the navy of the Muslims that the Prophet (saw) predicted. Does it satisfy you Habashi to be with those who attack a man when the dirt that he steps on is worth more than your life?
	Quote