I just skimmed through it and didn't follow up the links provided by brother SK. Here's the summary as written by one of the forumers there; * SK makes opening statements/arguments * Ruhanv making allegations and analysing a verse from the Quran to prove how it failed grammatically and logically * SK shows how Ruhanv in fact doesn't know anything about Arabic grammar/linguistics and provides with substantiated claims how perfectly grammatical it actually is * SK then provides evidence along with explanations and proofs in response to Ruhanv's claims * Ruhanv responds by refusing to look at any of the pieces of evidence that SK links * Ruhanv then also continues again with making allegations and accusations with his own subjective opinions on what he thinks about the Quran and Islam * SK again elaborates more on the details with copying/pasting exact quotes from these links to prove his points * SK goes on a rampage and continues to provide more and more compelling evidence * Ruhanv is nowhere to be seen Automatic forfeit done by Ruhanv and the crown goes to SK. Basically the responses from other atheist forumers were that they tried to support Ruhanv but neglecting the evidence put forward by SK, which is of course a mistake since everyone can go back to what was posted and demand a proof (or lack of). Allah Knows Best.