DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**chuecaloversvv** · 04-18-2012, 01:29 AM

But this would probably only be problematic if he thought that he was capable of this without the help of the Allah. Furthermore, I don't think that he feels that he is the only one qualified to take on this responsibility but that this responsibility has been thrust on him by others. I mean, I don't know how it is permissible for you to jump to the conclusion that if someone attempts to do something that they must be megalomaniacs. Would this make all those brothers who go on Tabligh megalomaniacs as well because they somehow believe that "they" can help change the condition of individual Muslims?

This really makes no sense.

It makes sense when you compare his old attitude, then think about what went on in his head that caused him to change from that, to his current liberal attitude.

The difference between him and tablighis, is that he is a public figure. So his thought process would have been different. It seems like he thought if he became nicer and less critical of the kuffar, it would some how benefit his community, when that has not occurred. What has happened is that he has started corrupting people, making them more liberal, more accomodating to kufr, arguing that hijab isn't necessary in the west, becoming a quasi-perrenialist, among other things.

04-18-2012, 01:29 AM	#12
chuecaloversvv Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 499 Senior Member	But this would probably only be problematic if he thought that he was capable of this without the help of the Allah. Furthermore, I don't think that he feels that he is the only one qualified to take on this responsibility but that this responsibility has been thrust on him by others. I mean, I don't know how it is permissible for you to jump to the conclusion that if someone attempts to do something that they must be megalomaniacs. Would this make all those brothers who go on Tabligh megalomaniacs as well because they somehow believe that "they" can help change the condition of individual Muslims? This really makes no sense. It makes sense when you compare his old attitude, then think about what went on in his head that caused him to change from that, to his current liberal attitude. The difference between him and tablighis, is that he is a public figure. So his thought process would have been different. It seems like he thought if he became nicer and less critical of the kuffar, it would some how benefit his community, when that has not occurred. What has happened is that he has started corrupting people, making them more liberal, more accomodating to kufr, arguing that hijab isn't necessary in the west, becoming a quasi-perrenialist, among other things.
	Quote