DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post - Misconception in the translation of Maraqi 's-Saadat

**anatmob** · 04-01-2012, 07:58 PM

I am reading the English translation of Maraqi 's-Saadat with its commentary by Faraz Khan and on page 48 it is written:

Wudu is nullified by any one of the following things:
1/...
2/...
3/...
4/ Sleeping in a position such that the buttocks are not firmly planted onto the ground, such as while lying down or leaning one one's side*
___________________
* As opposed to sleeping in a position with one's buttocks firmly planted onto the ground (or any firm surface), whereby wudu is not nullified. This ruling applies even if he were leaning onto something to the extent that, if it were removed, he would fall down (Hadiyya, Badai, Tabyin, Durr, Radd). From my superficial knowledge of the English language I understand that sleeping in a position with one's buttocks firmly planted onto the ground does not nullify wudu.

Is this right or just I haven't understood correctly?

04-01-2012, 07:58 PM	#1
anatmob Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 598 Senior Member	Misconception in the translation of Maraqi 's-Saadat I am reading the English translation of Maraqi 's-Saadat with its commentary by Faraz Khan and on page 48 it is written: Wudu is nullified by any one of the following things: 1/... 2/... 3/... 4/ Sleeping in a position such that the buttocks are not firmly planted onto the ground, such as while lying down or leaning one one's side* ___________________ * As opposed to sleeping in a position with one's buttocks firmly planted onto the ground (or any firm surface), whereby wudu is not nullified. This ruling applies even if he were leaning onto something to the extent that, if it were removed, he would fall down (Hadiyya, Badai, Tabyin, Durr, Radd). From my superficial knowledge of the English language I understand that sleeping in a position with one's buttocks firmly planted onto the ground does not nullify wudu. Is this right or just I haven't understood correctly?
	Quote