View Single Post
Old 04-04-2012, 08:11 PM   #8
rsdefwgxvcfdts

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
539
Senior Member
Default


We should not let scientific theories and discoveries influence our deen since belief in it may be inconsequential and if a theory or discovery is proven to be false (as is the norm in the scientific community), then some of us would end up defending something that is alien to Islam to begin with.

What we can see from this, as brother NNoor pointed out, is that the theory of human evolution continues to "evolve" itself. It has been the consensus amongst evolutionists that the first Homo sapiens appeared 400,000 years ago. This theory suggests that it may have been earlier, overlapping with many of the earlier Homo species. These earlier "species" were considered to lack any real sense of intelligence so to actually discover fire is something that seems uncharacteristic of them. There are even other holes that exist, such as the earliest primitive tools that exist predate the supposed advent of the Homo species and subspecies.
You have to remember that all the ancient bone fragments that the scientists create all these names from (and attach them to false evolutionary trees) even if they were all collected from around the world and put together, would not make much of a pile.

You have to understand that what is occurring is that only a small amount of physical evidence is available about ancient humanity from which researchers must then apply their minds to understanding.

This leaves a great space into which the existing philosophical ideas of the researchers tend to be projected (notably evolutionism)

and once this projection occurs it becomes part of the general belief system so that when it is challenged by evidence that is contrary to these theories then that evidence is usually ignored as it is easier for these people to do this than to accept that many of their basic assumptions are wrong.

Homo erectus were around well over a million years ago - they were just as human as Homo sapiens, the differences between the Homo errectus and Homo sapiens are just racial variation.

The bone structures of the Homo erectus people are different from those of modern Europeans but they fall within the scope of the wide range of differences that exist amongst modern races

- in fact there are races alive today who possess amongst their possible variations between individual the various different features that were possessed by the Homo erectus - including the same feautures that are used to differentiate them from so called 'modern Homo sapiens'.

There is a lot of racism in popular modern scientific thought (which is largely a Western way of thinking) and this is applied to living and past races in different ways.

For example racists used to try and class racial groups Australian Aborigines as being a so called 'evolutionary sub-human species' even into the 1970s CE (this was even taught in the Australian school system at one time).

There is no doubt in my mind that the Homo erectus people and the other ancient 'Homo' species after them were all from the children of Adam (as).
rsdefwgxvcfdts is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:35 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity