DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post - Shaikh abdul salam rustami

**allvideO** · 09-25-2011, 09:28 PM

Mufti Ibrahim Desai Sahib too has been inconsistent on this issue. Seems that earlier he used to favor mamati position and then switched to the Hayati side. http://www.sunniforum.com/forum/show...-Ebrahim-Desai

It seems you do not know much about the hayati or mamati issue. Better to stay out of it since your posts show how ignorant your are. Its a lafzi difference. The word dunyawiyya can be used differently. If used in the sense that Nabi can hear and see, nobody disagrees, if used in the sense of literally walking around in this world, and if you would dig up his grave, you would see him literally alive, then this wrong. Or in the sense of eating and relieving oneself etc., then this is also wrong.

Some of the extreme mamatis claim nabi can't hear the one at his grave, or says there is no connection between soul and body, and this the real point of difference.

09-25-2011, 09:28 PM	#26
allvideO Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 665 Senior Member	Mufti Ibrahim Desai Sahib too has been inconsistent on this issue. Seems that earlier he used to favor mamati position and then switched to the Hayati side. http://www.sunniforum.com/forum/show...-Ebrahim-Desai It seems you do not know much about the hayati or mamati issue. Better to stay out of it since your posts show how ignorant your are. Its a lafzi difference. The word dunyawiyya can be used differently. If used in the sense that Nabi can hear and see, nobody disagrees, if used in the sense of literally walking around in this world, and if you would dig up his grave, you would see him literally alive, then this wrong. Or in the sense of eating and relieving oneself etc., then this is also wrong. Some of the extreme mamatis claim nabi can't hear the one at his grave, or says there is no connection between soul and body, and this the real point of difference.
	Quote