View Single Post
Old 03-18-2012, 11:05 PM   #18
Podosinovik

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
413
Senior Member
Default
Asalam o Aleikum , sorry i always create controversial threads :P but can someone plzz finish my confusion in this matter

Imam Abu Hanifa said, 'The companions of the Prophet (S) were generally pious and just. I accept every hadith with evidence narrated by them, but I do not accept the hadith whose source is Abu Huraira, Anas ibn Malik, or Samra ibn Jundab '

my question is why did he said that ??? i am asking only for information


These are all allegations of the enemies of Islam and the Sunna.

The actual usul in hanafi fiqh is that those narrations of Abu Hurairah which are in agreement with analogy (al-qiyas) are adopted, and what is in disagreement with analogy, one sees if the Ahaadeeth has been accepted by the umma, only then it is adopted; otherwise analogy is adopted in preference to Ahaadeeth. (Usul al-Sarkhasi)

This principle comes from the Tabi'i Ibrahim al Nakha'i on the grounds that Hadrat Abu Hurayra was not amongst the fuqaha' sahaba.
Several scholars, particularly of the school of Imam Shafi'i(rah) differed with Ibrahim on this.

Those of the Companions of Allah's Messenger (saws) from whom fatwa was preserved are some one hundred and thirty souls that range between men and women and the mukhthirun (those who issued fatwa in large numbers) from them are seven: 'Umar ibn al Khattab, 'Ali ibn Abi Talib, 'Abdullah ibn Mas'ud, A'isha, mother of the believers, Zayd ibn Thabit, 'Abdullah ibn 'Abbas and 'Abdullah ibn 'Umar. (Ibn Qayyim in 'Ilaam al Muwaqi'in)

Podosinovik is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:11 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity