DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post - why have Ahle Sunnah started praising Yazeed :(

**CULTDIAMONDS** · 03-14-2012, 03:30 AM

i dont know if its barelwi site or not . . . i aint barelwi either . . .

what i mean is , in ahlus-sunnah site , it shows clearly , that yazid was drinker , responsible for killing of Imam Hussain (R.A) while in askimam it isnt praising yazeed but there are some hadiths which try to show his good character . . . but there isnt mention of any bad character of yazeed . . . ahlus-sunnah site has given also proofs of their refrences with scanned pages , so they are authentic . . . why not call him major faasiq and faajir ?? rather than remain silent . . . do you know because of this remaining silent , many of my friends are thinking that he was sahaba and add ( razi allhu anhu ) after him . . . if people dont show him to be faasiq , then how will people know whether he was wrong or not ?

Why does it matter? It's hard for me to see this a really relevant when in my world I see Muslims selling drugs, going to clubs,and doing everything else that will anger Allah ta'Ala. The Ulema deemed that the reports given about Yazid are weak so we remain silent because we cannot say with 100 percent surety that he was this evil man that people say you have to make takfir on just to be part of "Ahlus Sunnah"

03-14-2012, 03:30 AM	#28
CULTDIAMONDS Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 537 Senior Member	i dont know if its barelwi site or not . . . i aint barelwi either . . . what i mean is , in ahlus-sunnah site , it shows clearly , that yazid was drinker , responsible for killing of Imam Hussain (R.A) while in askimam it isnt praising yazeed but there are some hadiths which try to show his good character . . . but there isnt mention of any bad character of yazeed . . . ahlus-sunnah site has given also proofs of their refrences with scanned pages , so they are authentic . . . why not call him major faasiq and faajir ?? rather than remain silent . . . do you know because of this remaining silent , many of my friends are thinking that he was sahaba and add ( razi allhu anhu ) after him . . . if people dont show him to be faasiq , then how will people know whether he was wrong or not ? Why does it matter? It's hard for me to see this a really relevant when in my world I see Muslims selling drugs, going to clubs,and doing everything else that will anger Allah ta'Ala. The Ulema deemed that the reports given about Yazid are weak so we remain silent because we cannot say with 100 percent surety that he was this evil man that people say you have to make takfir on just to be part of "Ahlus Sunnah"
	Quote