[Fuerfsanv]

Salam Alaykum,

A certain Sikh reader of my website saw one of the articles on his religion, and he has tried to answer back. I have sent him a number of emails and the correspondence is ongoing.

There is one area however where I need more information, which is concerning the alleged atrocities commited by Muslim rulers of India to Hindus and Sikhs of that region. For example, the Sikh says:

... most of the decisions were taken by Muslim emperors like Aurangzed or Jahangir moreover their is place in Lahore where Mir Manu a Muslim governor ordered all the Sikh women were asked to convert to Islam but they refused look the kind of brutality he applied he killed the babies stuck on the spear and garland of face was made and hing around necks of those mothers what kind of decisions are you're talking about?

But moreover he was reciting the verses of Quran. But sikhs later came and freed those women and killed Mir Mannu for this genocide. If you look at the history of Islam is famous for genocides which Sikhs faced but when Islamic rulers messed with Sikhs they were destroyed. For you're kind information Ahmed Shah Durani came from Persia he was a Muslim raped Hindu women and then Sikhs decided to do something about it Sikhs defeated him in the battlefield. So I would like to know about the truth of such allegations and whether there is (perhaps) some hidden reason as to why such events may have occured as mentioned and still be in line with Islamic Shariah?