DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post - Hakeem ul Ummat (ra) and the reality and practicality of ta'addud

**Narcodran** · 02-26-2012, 08:49 PM

It seems you don't even the fiqh of your own elders such as Shaykh Ibn Abd al-Wahhab who was a pure Hanbali. It seems you don't even know the fiqh of your present day Ulama such as Shaykh Fawzaan who says the student of knowledge who has not reached ijtihad is STILL obliged to follow a MADHHAB.

Go argue with these Salafi madhhabis first.

What on earth is a pure Hanbali? Perhaps you mean someone who blindly follows the madhab even when it conflicts with Quran and Hadith? If that is your intention, then in fact Imam Muhammad b. Abdul Wahhab was not a pure Hanbali, for he said:

"If a person is learning fiqh from one of the four madhhabs, then he sees a hadeeth that opposes his madhhab; and so he follows it and leaves his madhhab - then this is recommended, rather it is obligatory upon him when the proof has been made clear to him." (Ad-Durur-Saniyyah (4/7))

02-26-2012, 08:49 PM	#16
Narcodran Join Date Nov 2005 Posts 586 Senior Member	It seems you don't even the fiqh of your own elders such as Shaykh Ibn Abd al-Wahhab who was a pure Hanbali. It seems you don't even know the fiqh of your present day Ulama such as Shaykh Fawzaan who says the student of knowledge who has not reached ijtihad is STILL obliged to follow a MADHHAB. Go argue with these Salafi madhhabis first. What on earth is a pure Hanbali? Perhaps you mean someone who blindly follows the madhab even when it conflicts with Quran and Hadith? If that is your intention, then in fact Imam Muhammad b. Abdul Wahhab was not a pure Hanbali, for he said: "If a person is learning fiqh from one of the four madhhabs, then he sees a hadeeth that opposes his madhhab; and so he follows it and leaves his madhhab - then this is recommended, rather it is obligatory upon him when the proof has been made clear to him." (Ad-Durur-Saniyyah (4/7))
	Quote