DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post - Keep Rushdie out of India

**didrexx** · 01-12-2012, 08:22 PM

True, but that's where the current crux of the argument is resting upon. The idea that Muslims(by conspiracy of "evil mullahs") will start a riot and there will be law and order problems.

And kafirs do want Salman Rushdie in India. To tilt the law to favor one guys "want" over another, requires reasoning and wisdom.

And that's exactly what Muslims have to do. The kafirs aren't guided by the Quran. It is Muslims who have the guidance. The onus falls upon Muslims to do dawa rather than simply expect kafirs to straight away agree to whatever a Muslim "wants". This is not a issue of Muslim personal law, but a law that infringes on the society irrespective of religion. So to get such a law that a covers a broad spectrum of people, it requires that these broad spectrum of people come to agreement with the Muslims on this issue. But the current issue is that, we already have laws. Yet no one is able to to take the law to its conclusion by showing how these ultra liberal speech is no different to some ultra right hindutva activist or some muslim "extremist". They all agree on preventing free speech to the latter, yet its somehow a free space for these ultra liberals to say anything they want as it is supposedly quite "creative".

Brother you are not looking at the problems of Muslims from the Muslim point of view.
In the history of independent India that seems to be the rule.
You are looking at the problems of Muslims as anybody else will look at them.
If everybody is doing that then there is something terribly wrong.
I'll tell a statement by former Congress chief Mr Sitaram Kesari. This was published perhaps more than ten years ago in a periodical from Kerala called the Meantime. He said that they were aware of the problems of Muslims but time and again they had put Muslims in charge of the things that affected the interests of the Muslims and every time they behaved exactly as others had behaved before that.
I am sorry brother warea you are committing the same mistake.
It might hurt you but I am not writing with that intention.

One of the first benefits of Islam is that you become aware and privy to the purpose of life. If you start thinking like others then you have wasted your advantage. That is a loss.

01-12-2012, 08:22 PM	#27
didrexx Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 481 Senior Member	True, but that's where the current crux of the argument is resting upon. The idea that Muslims(by conspiracy of "evil mullahs") will start a riot and there will be law and order problems. And kafirs do want Salman Rushdie in India. To tilt the law to favor one guys "want" over another, requires reasoning and wisdom. And that's exactly what Muslims have to do. The kafirs aren't guided by the Quran. It is Muslims who have the guidance. The onus falls upon Muslims to do dawa rather than simply expect kafirs to straight away agree to whatever a Muslim "wants". This is not a issue of Muslim personal law, but a law that infringes on the society irrespective of religion. So to get such a law that a covers a broad spectrum of people, it requires that these broad spectrum of people come to agreement with the Muslims on this issue. But the current issue is that, we already have laws. Yet no one is able to to take the law to its conclusion by showing how these ultra liberal speech is no different to some ultra right hindutva activist or some muslim "extremist". They all agree on preventing free speech to the latter, yet its somehow a free space for these ultra liberals to say anything they want as it is supposedly quite "creative". Brother you are not looking at the problems of Muslims from the Muslim point of view. In the history of independent India that seems to be the rule. You are looking at the problems of Muslims as anybody else will look at them. If everybody is doing that then there is something terribly wrong. I'll tell a statement by former Congress chief Mr Sitaram Kesari. This was published perhaps more than ten years ago in a periodical from Kerala called the Meantime. He said that they were aware of the problems of Muslims but time and again they had put Muslims in charge of the things that affected the interests of the Muslims and every time they behaved exactly as others had behaved before that. I am sorry brother warea you are committing the same mistake. It might hurt you but I am not writing with that intention. One of the first benefits of Islam is that you become aware and privy to the purpose of life. If you start thinking like others then you have wasted your advantage. That is a loss.
	Quote