[glasscollector]

For further clarification I would like to quote

the term hazir o nazir used when attributing to Allah is only feasible if the intention is to mean that He knows everything that happens everywhere...otherwise it should be avoided....Omnipresent word is not in Quran in the sense He is physically everywhere...this is in accordance with the ashari/maturdi aqeedah

the main objective of this post however is to make it as clear as water that many of my brothers here while refuting the hazir o nazir concept of brelvis labeled them as the ones committing shirk....as if my brothers believe that Allah exists everywhere physically which is indeed a wrong belief....and is not coherent with ashari/maturdi aqeedah the foundation of both deobandis/brelvis





Imam Abu Hanifah said in his book from his school al¬Wasiyyah: " ... and He is the Preserver of the Throne and of other than the Throne without needing it. Had He been in need, He would not have the power to create the world and to manage and preserve it. Moreover, had He been in a place needing to sit and rest before creating the Throne, where was Allah, then?" That is the question: 'where was Allah' would have applied to Him, which is impossible.
Also, in his book, Al-Fiqh al-Absat, Imam Abu Hanifah said: "Allah existed eternally and there was no place; He existed before creating the creation. He existed and there was not a place, a creation or a thing; and He is the Creator of everything. He who says 'I do not know if my Lord is in the heavens or on the earth, is a unbeliever. Also is an unbeliever whoever says that 'He is on the Throne and I do not know whether the Throne is in the heaven or on the earth'."