DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**rozneesitcn** · 01-25-2012, 03:53 AM

THOSE WHO SAY READ IBN KATHIR R.A ON THE AYAH I SAY READ THIS

Imam Ibn Kathir (radi Allahu anhu) has said in the book "AlBi'dayah" Vol.13, p. 136: "Sultan Muzaffar used to arrange the celebration of the Meelad Shareef with honour, glory, dignity and grandeur. In this connection he used to organise a magnificent festival". Then he said in praise of that man: "He was a pure-hearted, brave and wise Aalim (Scholar) and a just ruler, may Allah shower His Mercy upon him and grant him an exalted status."

I ASK THOSE PEOPLE TODAY THAT QUESTION THE MEELAD THAT WOULD YOU PRAISE A PERSON WHO INNOVATES BIDAAT E DALALAH( A BAD INNOVATION) THE WAY THAT IMAM IBN KATHEER HAS? THE ANSWER IS NO YOU WOULD NEVER PRAISE A MUBDATI BUT FROM THIS IT IS PROVEN THAT MEELAD IS NOT A EVIL INNOVATION AND EVEN IBN KATHEER AKNOWLEDGES THAT MEELAD IS NOT WRONG AND IS NOT A BIDDAT.

You're StrengtheningMyDeen.

What the scholars REALLY said about that deviant innovator who innovated the Mawlid celebration:

The celebration of the mawlid is an innovation in religion. Neither was it the practice of the Prophet صلى الله عليه و سلم nor did the companions or tabi’een celebrate this occasion. The great scholar, Allamah Anwar Shah Al-Kashmiri (May Allah Ta'ala be pleased with him) has said,

وأحدثه صوفي في عهد سلطان إربل سنة ( 600 ) ، ولم يكن له أصل من الشريعة الغراء

العرف الشذي شرح سنن الترمذي - (2 / 82 مؤسسة ضحى للنشر والتوزيع)

“A sufi innovated it in the era of Sultan Irbil around the year 600 A.H, and it does not have any basis in our pure Shariah.”

Scholars state that the first person to introduce the innovation (bid'a) of celebrating the Milad was the ruler of Irbil, Muzaffar ad-Din ibn Zain al-Din. This was six centuries after the period of prophet hood.

Allaamah Muizzuddin Hasan Khwaarzimi (rahmatullah alayh) states in his book, Al-Qawl al Mu’tamad,

“The Ruler of Irbal, King Muzaffar Abu Saeed Kaukari, was an irreligious and prodigal king. He ordered the scholars of his time to act according to their opinions and discard the practice of following any school of law. A group of learned men inclined towards him. He (this king) organized Mawlood sessions during the month of Rabi al Awwal. He was the first king ever to introduce this practice.”

A ‘scholar’ by the name of Abul Khattab Umar bin Hasan bin Dihya Al Andalusi supported and assisted the king in this innovation.

Allamah Ibn Kathir (May Allah Ta'ala have mercy on him) has reported on the authority of As-Sabt about this person,

قال السبط: وقد كان كابن عنين في ثلب المسلمين والوقيعة فيهم، ويتزيد في كلامه فترك الناس الرواية عنه وكذبوه

(البداية والنهاية - 13 / 169دار إحياء التراث العربي)

“Ibn Unain (Ibn Dihya) used to insult the Muslims and vilify them. He would make additions in his report and exaggerate. The people stopped narrating traditions from him and falsified him.” (Al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya, 3/144-146)

Ibn Hajar Al-Asqalani (May Allah Ta'ala have mercy on him) has commented on him,

وكان ظاهري المذهب كثير الوقيعة في الأئمة وفي السلف من العلماء خبيث اللسان أحمق شديد الكبر قليل النظر في أمور الدين متهاونا

(لسان الميزان - 4 / 296مؤسسة الأعلمي للمطبوعات – بيروت)

“He was a follower of the Zahiri school of thought and often slandered the scholars and the scholars of the past. He possessed an evil tongue and was stupid, self-conceited, lacked insight in religious matters, and looked down upon religion.” (Lisan al-Mizan, 4/296)

01-25-2012, 03:53 AM	#16
rozneesitcn Join Date Nov 2005 Posts 455 Senior Member	THOSE WHO SAY READ IBN KATHIR R.A ON THE AYAH I SAY READ THIS Imam Ibn Kathir (radi Allahu anhu) has said in the book "AlBi'dayah" Vol.13, p. 136: "Sultan Muzaffar used to arrange the celebration of the Meelad Shareef with honour, glory, dignity and grandeur. In this connection he used to organise a magnificent festival". Then he said in praise of that man: "He was a pure-hearted, brave and wise Aalim (Scholar) and a just ruler, may Allah shower His Mercy upon him and grant him an exalted status." I ASK THOSE PEOPLE TODAY THAT QUESTION THE MEELAD THAT WOULD YOU PRAISE A PERSON WHO INNOVATES BIDAAT E DALALAH( A BAD INNOVATION) THE WAY THAT IMAM IBN KATHEER HAS? THE ANSWER IS NO YOU WOULD NEVER PRAISE A MUBDATI BUT FROM THIS IT IS PROVEN THAT MEELAD IS NOT A EVIL INNOVATION AND EVEN IBN KATHEER AKNOWLEDGES THAT MEELAD IS NOT WRONG AND IS NOT A BIDDAT. You're StrengtheningMyDeen. What the scholars REALLY said about that deviant innovator who innovated the Mawlid celebration: The celebration of the mawlid is an innovation in religion. Neither was it the practice of the Prophet صلى الله عليه و سلم nor did the companions or tabi’een celebrate this occasion. The great scholar, Allamah Anwar Shah Al-Kashmiri (May Allah Ta'ala be pleased with him) has said, وأحدثه صوفي في عهد سلطان إربل سنة ( 600 ) ، ولم يكن له أصل من الشريعة الغراء العرف الشذي شرح سنن الترمذي - (2 / 82 مؤسسة ضحى للنشر والتوزيع) “A sufi innovated it in the era of Sultan Irbil around the year 600 A.H, and it does not have any basis in our pure Shariah.” Scholars state that the first person to introduce the innovation (bid'a) of celebrating the Milad was the ruler of Irbil, Muzaffar ad-Din ibn Zain al-Din. This was six centuries after the period of prophet hood. Allaamah Muizzuddin Hasan Khwaarzimi (rahmatullah alayh) states in his book, Al-Qawl al Mu’tamad, “The Ruler of Irbal, King Muzaffar Abu Saeed Kaukari, was an irreligious and prodigal king. He ordered the scholars of his time to act according to their opinions and discard the practice of following any school of law. A group of learned men inclined towards him. He (this king) organized Mawlood sessions during the month of Rabi al Awwal. He was the first king ever to introduce this practice.” A ‘scholar’ by the name of Abul Khattab Umar bin Hasan bin Dihya Al Andalusi supported and assisted the king in this innovation. Allamah Ibn Kathir (May Allah Ta'ala have mercy on him) has reported on the authority of As-Sabt about this person, قال السبط: وقد كان كابن عنين في ثلب المسلمين والوقيعة فيهم، ويتزيد في كلامه فترك الناس الرواية عنه وكذبوه (البداية والنهاية - 13 / 169دار إحياء التراث العربي) “Ibn Unain (Ibn Dihya) used to insult the Muslims and vilify them. He would make additions in his report and exaggerate. The people stopped narrating traditions from him and falsified him.” (Al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya, 3/144-146) Ibn Hajar Al-Asqalani (May Allah Ta'ala have mercy on him) has commented on him, وكان ظاهري المذهب كثير الوقيعة في الأئمة وفي السلف من العلماء خبيث اللسان أحمق شديد الكبر قليل النظر في أمور الدين متهاونا (لسان الميزان - 4 / 296مؤسسة الأعلمي للمطبوعات – بيروت) “He was a follower of the Zahiri school of thought and often slandered the scholars and the scholars of the past. He possessed an evil tongue and was stupid, self-conceited, lacked insight in religious matters, and looked down upon religion.” (Lisan al-Mizan, 4/296)
	Quote