DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post - Qasidah Burda- Shirk?

**ringtonesmannq** · 04-25-2009, 05:56 PM

Unfortunately, the English language is not a hujjah in Islamic sciences. Please do not use it in the discussion

Im going to ignore this Salafi/Ahl Al-Sunnah nonesense that you seem to bring up in every thread. Its completely irrelevant to the subject at hand.

This is not my idea. In the Arabic language, if a generalization is used (Ilm al-Allawh Walqalam), you dont assume that there are exceptions. Its hilarious to see how you people make far fetched explanations up just to justify a line of poetry! He says, among your knowledge is the knowledge of THE LAWH AND QALAm (meaning all of it).

Brother,

The example in English serves the same purpose as in Arabic e.g. tells you how not to go down the path of literal interpretation and take linguistics into consideration which you (salafees) can't grasp for some reason.

You have STILL TO ANSWER as to who did you assume that the couplet in question means to say that the Prophet (Sallaho Alaihe Wassallam) knows everyting from Luh and Qalam or has independent access to it. Please give me a grammatical breakdown as to why you are assuming that?

Don't assume things and don't put your own thoughts into people's minds unless you have some evidence to back it up!

Again this is NOT Arabic langauge generalisation, this is your twisted idea and assuming the worst of Muslims (another typical Salafi trait) which is against the Sunnah as we are supposed to assume the best in a Muslim (and not the worst), give excuses and protect the dignity of a Muslim as I am sure that somewhere you must have come across this Hadeeth.

P.S: The bits in RED BOLD speaks volumes about how you actually think about other Muslims.

04-25-2009, 05:56 PM	#35
ringtonesmannq Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 464 Senior Member	Unfortunately, the English language is not a hujjah in Islamic sciences. Please do not use it in the discussion Im going to ignore this Salafi/Ahl Al-Sunnah nonesense that you seem to bring up in every thread. Its completely irrelevant to the subject at hand. This is not my idea. In the Arabic language, if a generalization is used (Ilm al-Allawh Walqalam), you dont assume that there are exceptions. Its hilarious to see how you people make far fetched explanations up just to justify a line of poetry! He says, among your knowledge is the knowledge of THE LAWH AND QALAm (meaning all of it). Brother, The example in English serves the same purpose as in Arabic e.g. tells you how not to go down the path of literal interpretation and take linguistics into consideration which you (salafees) can't grasp for some reason. You have STILL TO ANSWER as to who did you assume that the couplet in question means to say that the Prophet (Sallaho Alaihe Wassallam) knows everyting from Luh and Qalam or has independent access to it. Please give me a grammatical breakdown as to why you are assuming that? Don't assume things and don't put your own thoughts into people's minds unless you have some evidence to back it up! Again this is NOT Arabic langauge generalisation, this is your twisted idea and assuming the worst of Muslims (another typical Salafi trait) which is against the Sunnah as we are supposed to assume the best in a Muslim (and not the worst), give excuses and protect the dignity of a Muslim as I am sure that somewhere you must have come across this Hadeeth. P.S: The bits in RED BOLD speaks volumes about how you actually think about other Muslims.
	Quote