DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post - For those who rush to condemn "Boko Haram" and other "radical Islamists" w/o proof...

**nTDsD0aU** · 01-09-2012, 07:27 PM

They have to be condenmed as the actions are clearly forbidden. Who is behind it, does not justify the action. The lack of condemnation and such free allowance of terrorist groups to operate under Islam is precisely the reason why kafirs can take advantage of it and easily blame Muslims. We will never know whos behind it. The Muslims of Nigeria are better source of knowledge then New York Times.

Another point I want to make is that, all groups who operate in a hidden manner should be rejected. The Prophet(pbuh) nor the companions operated as hidden shadowy people. We don't know who exactly is behind this plenty of hidden groups, which could be enemys of Islam playing games to hatch plots. So this danger should be enough to reject them outright as defult view and only listen to them if the come out in public view and clarify their associations and backgrounds and intentions.

Wasalam

Right, so the actions are forbidden, but the question is- who is doing them? it is not answered by the media, and there is no point in doing condemnations of whom the media says is doing bad things. Why is that? because the media is a bunch of lying kuffar, so what is the point of listening to the media and saying 'well the MEDIA SEZ THAT BOKO HARAM IZ DOIN THIS SO I CONDEMN IT.' How do you know it's even happening that way? And furthermore, what does your 'condemnation' do?

Kaafirs will blame Islam anyway, they don't care if you condemn it or not. In the US, there is a joke- whenever a Muslim does something anywhere in the world, CAIR issues a press release. Nobody 'cairs' if you'll pardon the pun. They are not printed and they are probably thrown away unopened as the wolves in journalists' clothing descend savagely on some new reason to attack Islam and the Muslims.

mh- do you think their actual name is 'Boko Haram?' it's a derogatory nickname given to them by the media.

Look, I'm not saying that the actions which they are being blamed for are good. What I am saying is twofold;
1) There is no benefit in condemning them or doing anything whatsoever about them, including discussing them, unless first-hand information is had, and none of us have that now and none of us will have it in the near future.
2) see #1.

01-09-2012, 07:27 PM	#6
nTDsD0aU Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 528 Senior Member	They have to be condenmed as the actions are clearly forbidden. Who is behind it, does not justify the action. The lack of condemnation and such free allowance of terrorist groups to operate under Islam is precisely the reason why kafirs can take advantage of it and easily blame Muslims. We will never know whos behind it. The Muslims of Nigeria are better source of knowledge then New York Times. Another point I want to make is that, all groups who operate in a hidden manner should be rejected. The Prophet(pbuh) nor the companions operated as hidden shadowy people. We don't know who exactly is behind this plenty of hidden groups, which could be enemys of Islam playing games to hatch plots. So this danger should be enough to reject them outright as defult view and only listen to them if the come out in public view and clarify their associations and backgrounds and intentions. Wasalam Right, so the actions are forbidden, but the question is- who is doing them? it is not answered by the media, and there is no point in doing condemnations of whom the media says is doing bad things. Why is that? because the media is a bunch of lying kuffar, so what is the point of listening to the media and saying 'well the MEDIA SEZ THAT BOKO HARAM IZ DOIN THIS SO I CONDEMN IT.' How do you know it's even happening that way? And furthermore, what does your 'condemnation' do? Kaafirs will blame Islam anyway, they don't care if you condemn it or not. In the US, there is a joke- whenever a Muslim does something anywhere in the world, CAIR issues a press release. Nobody 'cairs' if you'll pardon the pun. They are not printed and they are probably thrown away unopened as the wolves in journalists' clothing descend savagely on some new reason to attack Islam and the Muslims. mh- do you think their actual name is 'Boko Haram?' it's a derogatory nickname given to them by the media. Look, I'm not saying that the actions which they are being blamed for are good. What I am saying is twofold; 1) There is no benefit in condemning them or doing anything whatsoever about them, including discussing them, unless first-hand information is had, and none of us have that now and none of us will have it in the near future. 2) see #1.
	Quote