[Ilaubuas]

Some of these kuffar make a living from being atheist; what is to be expected from them? PZM claims the whole paper is post hoc rationalisation but he doesn't prove any of his claims. For example, if I read a book by Dawkins and proceed to say that the book contains nothing but faulty logic, I must explain in what way... it is not enough to make a claim without proof. PMZ also goes on to make fun of the fact that the paper is about two verses of the Quran and that we claim the entirety of embryological science can be implied into those sentences. He does not take into account the fact that the paper talks about numerous hadith as well as verses of Quran, nor does he take into account the fact that arabic words are so specific they can convey a whole books worth of meanings in a sentence. In fact, to dismiss the entire paper on the basis that it talks about two specific verses in itself is illogical... the article must be refuted, not mocked for mockery is not refutation from a logical standpoint in this case