[abouthotels]

O bhai paindoo

This is the teaching of Sufiyyh?

وَلَا تَلْمِزُوا أَنفُسَكُمْ وَلَا تَنَابَزُوا بِالْأَلْقَابِ ۖ بِئْسَ الِاسْمُ الْفُسُوقُ بَعْدَ الْإِيمَانِ ۚ وَمَن لَّمْ يَتُبْ فَأُولَٰئِكَ هُمُ الظَّالِمُونَ

nor call each other by (offensive) nicknames: Ill-seeming is a name connoting wickedness, (to be used of one) after he has believed: And those who do not desist are (indeed) doing wrong.

I warned you because, this the public forum, and your post was creating intensionally or unintensionally soft corner to Ahle Bidat, like you said some syrian scholar like them both (Deos and followers of 'Ala Hazard) .

And Saad's post clearly states that Pir shahab was definitely againts Ilm Ghayab of Nabi (s.a.w), which is the essential component of 'Ala Hazard Ahmed Raza Khan Barelvi's Aqid. Then how could this principle disagreement be change into praised of 'Ala Hazard by Pir sahab, therefore your question was irrational and hazardous.