[nonDosearrany]

Quote:

"The e-petition to put Babar Ahmad on trial in the UK has now closed, having secured over 140,000 signatures, a phenomenal response in such a short space of time. The Free Babar Ahmad (FBA) Campaign commends supporters who have worked tirelessly over the last three months to raise awareness of Babar’s case, encouraging members of the public to sign the petition.

In spite of the enormous public support for the matter, the Parliamentary Backbench Business Committee has now refused to list this issue for a full debate in the main chamber of the House of Commons where it could be voted on by Members of Parliament; instead the motion has been relegated to form part of a pre-existing discussion on extradition, led by Dominic Raab MP, in Westminster Hall on 24th November 2011.
Discussions in Westminster Hall are not subjected to a vote and rarely have any practical effect. Other e-petitions which secured 100,000 signatures (including Hillsborough and the EU) have been subjected to a full debate in the House of Commons with a vote rather than being sidelined as a Westminster Hall discussion. It is therefore only fair that the petition to put Babar Ahmad on trial in the UK, which over 140,000 people have signed, also be fully debated and voted on.

Listing Babar’s case for discussion in Westminster Hall is a convenient way for Parliament to wash their hands of the matter by not subjecting the issue for a vote. The two reasons that have been given for refusing to have Babar’s petition debated in the main Chamber is that it lacks public support and that there is not enough time left in this year’s calendar for such a debate."


The e-petition's are just lip service exercises to demonstrate the support of the false idealogical view of democracy. All governments historically have taken the views and opinions of a hand full of people within a think-tank especially those well versed in sociology, politics, economics, etc. The decent governments have done it with the best interest of all peoples and the not so decent have their own agenda.

Many were put under pressure to sign the e-petition with the support of Islamic personalities via youtube, facebook, email, etc and then the mass support via blogs, websites and forums. In my personal opinion I believe this unfortunate result will have a detrimental effect on the mindset of the Muslims as a whole especially in the UK.

I compare this to Asian groups demanding a small football pitch in the town due to the high intake of drugs in the community but the local council constantly refuses in spite of this. The consequences is the disheartened community members believe that these endeavours are useless and without result and never embark on them again and go into silos for years to come until another group of people much smarter take up the stand. This particular example is not that great but I have seen this over and over again. However now you have the power of the internet that draws across the entire globe and attracts 100,000 votes in a short span of time but has the same consequences if 10 people went down to the local council.

I do not believe I am being over simplistic in describing the situation but peeling away the layers should provide this understanding.

Further what is this e-petition? seriously! think about it. How can you take it seriously? On what basis? Electronic signatures, please! What are the rules of validation? Any intelligent analysis of any OPPOSING party of a Government would instantly ask this question. But since all parties are in favour of this e-petition only those issues that are already in Government agenda for discussion which the public has expressed an interest can be accepted otherwise it would be a media circus for them with the first question being 'How to we validate that these 100,000+ votes are even real?"

Here is the link for full story http://freebabarahmad.com/the-story/...on-babar-ahmad