View Single Post
Old 02-05-2011, 06:31 AM   #27
WrinnaArraple

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
462
Senior Member
Default


That Rabi` al-Madkhali was distorting the writings of Sayyid Qutb to the major Salafi scholars, which is why they criticized Sayyid Qutb and praised Rabi`.
It is indeed interesting to see that the Salafi scholars criticize the Ikhwanis, when in fact, in fiqh and aqidah, they are both the same! Neither follow maddhabs, and reject the Ash'aris/Maturidis. Yusuf Al Qaradawi, the main figure head for the Ikhwanis today, is the prime example of the deviant Ikhwanis. He mentions in the introduction of his work Al Halal wal Haram fil Islam that by the grace of Allah, he was freed from the partisanship (ta'assub) of "blind following" of a maddhab. Sound familiar? Oh yeah, he is just echoing Albani, and his cohorts Salih al Fawzan, etc.

In addition, Sayyid Sabiq mentions in his introduction to his work Fiqh as Sunnah which is filled with all sorts of errors and impermissible talfiq that the founder of the Ikhwanis, Hasan Al Banna, was actually the one who encouraged him to write the work so that blind following of maddhahib could be disproved. I dont know why our akabir put up with these Ikhwanis, such as Qaradawi, instead of rejecting their deviations from some 1400 years of orthodox scholarship.

As for Qutb, then his ideas were like Jamaate Islami, which Deobandis criticize left and right. Why not do the same for Qutb? I must admit I am unable to answer these questions.
WrinnaArraple is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:48 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity