DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post - Difference Between Being A Wahhabi and A Salafi

**22CreessGah** · 02-07-2011, 11:20 PM

I was referring to Hijjaz while mentioning the "arab land". i think hanbalis have always been dominante in that area and its my personal observation that no other madhab and aqeedah can fit their mind better than hanbalism.

Leaving aside Makkah/Madina Najd (that is the correct word and still used today) was an insignificant backwater in the Islamic world about which nobody really cared about.

Its oil (money) and their treachery against Islamic Caliphate (POST-1924) and their continued treachery against Islam which is of significance.

Makkah/Madina have always been the land of all 4 Madhabs because they occupy a central position in Islam. Petro-Dollars ensured that this was changed to "1-state-version of Islam" because thats what Saudia practises. To this Saudi Government continues to back-stab Islam and Muslims.

I believe that Shaykh Muhammad Ibn Abdul-Wahab (RA) was a sincere person whose movement got hijacked and then "Ahl-e-Hadeeth" mindset from India/Pakistan and Middle-East changed it further in the 1950's & 1960s.

If you live and work in Saudia and interact with Saudees, you will know that they are intellectually bankrupt & lazy people.

We only wish that these people followed in the foot-steps of great Ahmed Ibn Hanbal (RA); picking up bits and bobs from the Hanbali Madhab and over-emphasing them DOES NOT make someone a Hanbali!

To the best of my knowledge Hanbali Madhab neither calls for state-suppression of other Madhabs nor collusion with Kuffar.

02-07-2011, 11:20 PM	#39
22CreessGah Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 447 Senior Member	I was referring to Hijjaz while mentioning the "arab land". i think hanbalis have always been dominante in that area and its my personal observation that no other madhab and aqeedah can fit their mind better than hanbalism. Leaving aside Makkah/Madina Najd (that is the correct word and still used today) was an insignificant backwater in the Islamic world about which nobody really cared about. Its oil (money) and their treachery against Islamic Caliphate (POST-1924) and their continued treachery against Islam which is of significance. Makkah/Madina have always been the land of all 4 Madhabs because they occupy a central position in Islam. Petro-Dollars ensured that this was changed to "1-state-version of Islam" because thats what Saudia practises. To this Saudi Government continues to back-stab Islam and Muslims. I believe that Shaykh Muhammad Ibn Abdul-Wahab (RA) was a sincere person whose movement got hijacked and then "Ahl-e-Hadeeth" mindset from India/Pakistan and Middle-East changed it further in the 1950's & 1960s. If you live and work in Saudia and interact with Saudees, you will know that they are intellectually bankrupt & lazy people. We only wish that these people followed in the foot-steps of great Ahmed Ibn Hanbal (RA); picking up bits and bobs from the Hanbali Madhab and over-emphasing them DOES NOT make someone a Hanbali! To the best of my knowledge Hanbali Madhab neither calls for state-suppression of other Madhabs nor collusion with Kuffar.
	Quote