DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**cenRealliat** · 11-02-2011, 09:40 PM

That's my point, the Bible is self-contradictory.

Isa

flat-out says "Why are you attributing to me something that is attributed to God, only God has this (goodness)" And you say 'well this means blarghyblarghyblurghington,"

Alas! What foolishness that anyone would accept a doctrine as absurd as the trinity which has no textual basis. When Tawhid is simple, lucid, and clear.

People say "The Trinity is a mystery because God is a mystery, it is necessary to have faith in it but understanding it is impossible,"
But Paul said: "God is not the author of confusion," (Corinthians 14). It is more logical for Tawhid to be true than the trinity because Tawhid is not confusing, while the trinity is.

Isa

was supposedly tempted by the devil? (Mark I) So God can be tempted by the devil?
Alternately, your translation of this idea- Isa

was human on earth and God in the heavens (naudhubillah).
To that, I would reply- this invalidates the sacrifice, because it would have been just as simple for God to create a human who was sinless for the same purpose- so if a sinless human can die for the sins of the world (as this is what you claim happened) then John 3:16 is incoherent.

11-02-2011, 09:40 PM	#14
cenRealliat Join Date Nov 2005 Posts 520 Senior Member	That's my point, the Bible is self-contradictory. Isa flat-out says "Why are you attributing to me something that is attributed to God, only God has this (goodness)" And you say 'well this means blarghyblarghyblurghington," Alas! What foolishness that anyone would accept a doctrine as absurd as the trinity which has no textual basis. When Tawhid is simple, lucid, and clear. People say "The Trinity is a mystery because God is a mystery, it is necessary to have faith in it but understanding it is impossible," But Paul said: "God is not the author of confusion," (Corinthians 14). It is more logical for Tawhid to be true than the trinity because Tawhid is not confusing, while the trinity is. Isa was supposedly tempted by the devil? (Mark I) So God can be tempted by the devil? Alternately, your translation of this idea- Isa was human on earth and God in the heavens (naudhubillah). To that, I would reply- this invalidates the sacrifice, because it would have been just as simple for God to create a human who was sinless for the same purpose- so if a sinless human can die for the sins of the world (as this is what you claim happened) then John 3:16 is incoherent.
	Quote