DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**inhitoemits** · 10-20-2011, 01:49 AM

I've read both of those previously, Nuh Keller's from the index of Reliance and Haddad's from his 'Biographies' section. However, they do not answer the question I posed.

1) Since the words of Ibn Arabi are disbelief, why are they translated, including the words that are supposedly interpolated and spurious?
2) Why have commentaries been authored on the Fusus by people agreeing with those words and saying things like 'Worship of the calf is worship of Allah because Allah has an aspect in every worshipped thing?'

who r the translators u r referrimg to?

10-20-2011, 01:49 AM	#10
inhitoemits Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 537 Senior Member	I've read both of those previously, Nuh Keller's from the index of Reliance and Haddad's from his 'Biographies' section. However, they do not answer the question I posed. 1) Since the words of Ibn Arabi are disbelief, why are they translated, including the words that are supposedly interpolated and spurious? 2) Why have commentaries been authored on the Fusus by people agreeing with those words and saying things like 'Worship of the calf is worship of Allah because Allah has an aspect in every worshipped thing?' who r the translators u r referrimg to?
	Quote