DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**Barryrich** · 04-28-2007, 03:18 PM

Nothing has been dubunked. The people doing this "debunking" are basing what they say A LOT more on theory and weak information than their counter parts.

But since you are an expert I would like you to dubunk or state you opinion on a few things for me:

1) Why Did the 9/11 Commision's report not show the correct design of the WTC buildings when then were doing their dubunking? They completely left out the MANY Internal Support beams that ran through the center of the building that were a key component in the buildings safety design.

2) Why did the 9/11 Commision's report not indicate what happened to building 7?

3) Why was the building going through such extreme "renovations" weeks leading up to 9/11?

4) Why were the dogs that sniff for bombs pulled from the building weeks before the attack?

Originally Posted by Conan21

1.) The 9/11 commission report was not intended to debunk any of the 9/11 conspiracy theories. The intent of the report was to provide the fullest possible account of the events the transpired on 9/11 and was compiled by a team of five democrats and five republicans. Are you telling me that these individuals were also in on the conspiracy?

2.) Again the 9/11 commission report was not designed to eliminate conspiracy theories. Have you even read it?

3.) Prove this was happening and use a reputable source. Alex Jones is not a reputable source. lol

4.) Not sure that they were pulled away but I do know that if you want to blow up the world trade center with a controlled demolition you dont need to hit it with aircraft. By the way where are these people who set these devices? Lets add them to the number of people involved in this grand conspiracy.

04-28-2007, 03:18 PM	#14
Barryrich Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 609 Senior Member	Nothing has been dubunked. The people doing this "debunking" are basing what they say A LOT more on theory and weak information than their counter parts. But since you are an expert I would like you to dubunk or state you opinion on a few things for me: 1) Why Did the 9/11 Commision's report not show the correct design of the WTC buildings when then were doing their dubunking? They completely left out the MANY Internal Support beams that ran through the center of the building that were a key component in the buildings safety design. 2) Why did the 9/11 Commision's report not indicate what happened to building 7? 3) Why was the building going through such extreme "renovations" weeks leading up to 9/11? 4) Why were the dogs that sniff for bombs pulled from the building weeks before the attack? Originally Posted by Conan21 1.) The 9/11 commission report was not intended to debunk any of the 9/11 conspiracy theories. The intent of the report was to provide the fullest possible account of the events the transpired on 9/11 and was compiled by a team of five democrats and five republicans. Are you telling me that these individuals were also in on the conspiracy? 2.) Again the 9/11 commission report was not designed to eliminate conspiracy theories. Have you even read it? 3.) Prove this was happening and use a reputable source. Alex Jones is not a reputable source. lol 4.) Not sure that they were pulled away but I do know that if you want to blow up the world trade center with a controlled demolition you dont need to hit it with aircraft. By the way where are these people who set these devices? Lets add them to the number of people involved in this grand conspiracy.
	Quote