DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**Donlupedron** · 08-18-2011, 09:08 PM

I was under the impression that Behe had been refuted. http://www.talkdesign.org/faqs/icdmy....html#argument

Many Darwinian scientists have reviewed this book since its publication, and tried to refute its arguments. Behe has responded to some of these in a chapter Irreducible complexity: obstacle to Darwinian evolution in Debating Design: From Darwin to DNA , W. A. Dembski and M. Ruse Eds (Cambridge University Press, 2004).

08-18-2011, 09:08 PM	#11
Donlupedron Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 534 Senior Member	I was under the impression that Behe had been refuted. http://www.talkdesign.org/faqs/icdmy....html#argument Many Darwinian scientists have reviewed this book since its publication, and tried to refute its arguments. Behe has responded to some of these in a chapter Irreducible complexity: obstacle to Darwinian evolution in Debating Design: From Darwin to DNA , W. A. Dembski and M. Ruse Eds (Cambridge University Press, 2004).
	Quote