DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post - Shaykh Abd al-Fattah Abu Ghuddah and Kashf al-Abatil

**chzvacmyye** · 10-28-2009, 05:11 AM

Sidi Zulfiqar, Mulla 'Ali Qari was very well aware of Ibn taymiyya, why do i say that? Because his shaykh, Ibn Hajar Haytami, was very clear on his position on Ibn taymiyya, yet Mulla 'Ali Qari takes the opposite position.

Assalâmu 'Alaykum akhî,

It might be that he is among those who believed that he made repentance, it is known in Ibn Taymiyyah's books that he believes Allâh Most High has a place. If Imâm 'Aliy al-Qâri makes takfîr upon one who attributes place to Allâh Most High then it is highly possible that he believed that Ibn Taymiyyah repented.

About six works total. Now to say that Mulla 'Ali wasn't aware of Ibn taymiyya doesn't seem to hold much weight (in my opinion). And if you look at Sharh Fiqhul Akbar, yes he was maturdi, but he did agree with ithbat of Sifat, and not doing interpretation, as was the stance of Imam al-'Adham. Akhî, whether ithbât or ta'wîl is not important regarding this, the important thing is that he is against attributing direction, place, limit etc. to Allâh Most High. Ibn Taymiyyah attributed place and direction to Allâh Most High.

BarakAllâhu fîkum

10-28-2009, 05:11 AM	#17
chzvacmyye Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 484 Senior Member	Sidi Zulfiqar, Mulla 'Ali Qari was very well aware of Ibn taymiyya, why do i say that? Because his shaykh, Ibn Hajar Haytami, was very clear on his position on Ibn taymiyya, yet Mulla 'Ali Qari takes the opposite position. Assalâmu 'Alaykum akhî, It might be that he is among those who believed that he made repentance, it is known in Ibn Taymiyyah's books that he believes Allâh Most High has a place. If Imâm 'Aliy al-Qâri makes takfîr upon one who attributes place to Allâh Most High then it is highly possible that he believed that Ibn Taymiyyah repented. About six works total. Now to say that Mulla 'Ali wasn't aware of Ibn taymiyya doesn't seem to hold much weight (in my opinion). And if you look at Sharh Fiqhul Akbar, yes he was maturdi, but he did agree with ithbat of Sifat, and not doing interpretation, as was the stance of Imam al-'Adham. Akhî, whether ithbât or ta'wîl is not important regarding this, the important thing is that he is against attributing direction, place, limit etc. to Allâh Most High. Ibn Taymiyyah attributed place and direction to Allâh Most High. BarakAllâhu fîkum
	Quote