With all due respect - are you Hanafi in what suits you from your personal readings of such works? Or are you a follower of al-Albani's fiqh? Anyway, do you read pure arabic? If you do not then how can you claim the Hanafi fiqh of Salah is not correct in many aspects - just by reading works by 2 non-Hanafi's? There exist rudud on al-Albani's book of Salah as well as critiques on the contents of Fiqhus-Sunna of al-Sabiq. What are the precise weakness' you have spotted in Hanafi Salah? Your objections on these so called weakness' and their answers can usually be found in the 18 volume I'la al-Sunan by Allama Zafar Ahmed al-Uthmani (d. 1974 ) and the one volume Athar al-Sunan by Shaykh al-Nimawi (died about a century ago) - insha'allah. Have you read the "Salah of the Believer" by Shaykh Riyadh al-Haq - as it is a good intro providing Hanafi dala'il for Salah?