DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**BloofPailafum** · 07-28-2011, 06:18 PM

Have you read the link I posted. Without reading the link, there is no point even asking this. The problem lies with defective understanding plaguing the laymen muslims with no appreciation of complex sciences of fiqh, hadith etc of today.
Know this not All hadith is Sunnah but all sunnah are illuminated in hadith. Hadith being sahih does not make it acceptable to act upon if it violates the law. hadith masters /muhadith are like phramacist, and Muftis or Faqih are like sergent. This is why laymen follows school of jurisprudance.
Their role are different. Anyway go through the link and find out the relation between Fiqh and hadith. It is sheer ignorance to assume that entire deen is only in 6000+ statment of hadith.

Dear Brother, Assalaamoalaikum

Brother Jive is not addressing the issue of fiqh and hadith. He wishes to know whether all the hadiths in Sahih al-Bukhari (subject to the observation made by our brother TripolySunni regarding the title of the book) are sahih or not.

Let me put the question in another way.

It is my understanding that Imam al-Bukhari (May Allah (SWT) Be Pleased with him) collected some 600,000 narrations, memorised some 200,000 of them, sifted through all his collection, spent a whole life deciding which ones to include in his final compilation, performed Istikhara Salaah (whenever he had doubts, I believe), included narrations that look contradictory or containing different messages on one and the same subject (indicating his sincerity and honesty), not to mention other precautions he took in accepting narrations from someone - and finally ending up with 7563 narrations.

Would it still be possible that he knowingly included some "weak" hadiths in his compilation?

This is the question being asked by our Brother Jive.

Brotherly yours
farook

07-28-2011, 06:18 PM	#10
BloofPailafum Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 357 Senior Member	Have you read the link I posted. Without reading the link, there is no point even asking this. The problem lies with defective understanding plaguing the laymen muslims with no appreciation of complex sciences of fiqh, hadith etc of today. Know this not All hadith is Sunnah but all sunnah are illuminated in hadith. Hadith being sahih does not make it acceptable to act upon if it violates the law. hadith masters /muhadith are like phramacist, and Muftis or Faqih are like sergent. This is why laymen follows school of jurisprudance. Their role are different. Anyway go through the link and find out the relation between Fiqh and hadith. It is sheer ignorance to assume that entire deen is only in 6000+ statment of hadith. Dear Brother, Assalaamoalaikum Brother Jive is not addressing the issue of fiqh and hadith. He wishes to know whether all the hadiths in Sahih al-Bukhari (subject to the observation made by our brother TripolySunni regarding the title of the book) are sahih or not. Let me put the question in another way. It is my understanding that Imam al-Bukhari (May Allah (SWT) Be Pleased with him) collected some 600,000 narrations, memorised some 200,000 of them, sifted through all his collection, spent a whole life deciding which ones to include in his final compilation, performed Istikhara Salaah (whenever he had doubts, I believe), included narrations that look contradictory or containing different messages on one and the same subject (indicating his sincerity and honesty), not to mention other precautions he took in accepting narrations from someone - and finally ending up with 7563 narrations. Would it still be possible that he knowingly included some "weak" hadiths in his compilation? This is the question being asked by our Brother Jive. Brotherly yours farook
	Quote