DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post - What do the scholars/historians say regarding sharif hussain and the ottomans?

**Aswdwdfg** · 07-10-2011, 03:32 PM

These are two separate incidents. Both of them did it to capture Hijaaz. Hijaaz was the most important place to capture to establish your Rule in the hearts of the Muslims. Whoever controls Haramain, he gets automatic respect from the whole Ummah.

Please read:

Chiraagh e Muhammad: Biography of Hazrat Sheikh ul Islam, written by Maulana Zahid Al-Hussaini [RA] (Khailfah and Student of Hazrat Hussain Ahmed Madni Rahimahullah Ta'ala)

Also read the Biography of hazrat Sheikh ul Hind (RA), I forgot the name.

If you have read these books,is there any indication that Shaykhul Hind felt betrayed/felt Sharif Hussein was a traitor/had a bad opinion of Sharif Hussein,or did it come accross as Sharif Hussein had a different opinion and felt that seccession from the ottomans was better while Shaykhul Hind aadopted the view that seccession would be detrimaental.

was salaam

07-10-2011, 03:32 PM	#8
Aswdwdfg Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 520 Senior Member	These are two separate incidents. Both of them did it to capture Hijaaz. Hijaaz was the most important place to capture to establish your Rule in the hearts of the Muslims. Whoever controls Haramain, he gets automatic respect from the whole Ummah. Please read: Chiraagh e Muhammad: Biography of Hazrat Sheikh ul Islam, written by Maulana Zahid Al-Hussaini [RA] (Khailfah and Student of Hazrat Hussain Ahmed Madni Rahimahullah Ta'ala) Also read the Biography of hazrat Sheikh ul Hind (RA), I forgot the name. If you have read these books,is there any indication that Shaykhul Hind felt betrayed/felt Sharif Hussein was a traitor/had a bad opinion of Sharif Hussein,or did it come accross as Sharif Hussein had a different opinion and felt that seccession from the ottomans was better while Shaykhul Hind aadopted the view that seccession would be detrimaental. was salaam
	Quote