DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**skydaypat** · 07-03-2011, 11:40 PM

Just for argument's sake. He said he's more at ease following Sh Ghazali then Sh Taqi on this issue, but I say why not do it for mawlid also ?

I assume you are referring to the mawlid of rabi-ul-awaal, and not the weekly mawlid of fasting on Mondays which is derived from the sunnah.

1. Mawlid of rabi-ul awaal started approx 600 ah. I don't think al ghazzli even has a view on the mawlid as it started after his time.

2. Even if Ghazzali had a pro-view on it, the issue of mawlid and laylatul Isra are worlds apart, becasue the mawlid of rabi-ul-awaal has no refererence from the ahadith, whereas layatul miraj does, as already shown.

And how do you know what my view on mawlid is anyway, when I am not even sure about it myself?

07-03-2011, 11:40 PM	#40
skydaypat Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 441 Senior Member	Just for argument's sake. He said he's more at ease following Sh Ghazali then Sh Taqi on this issue, but I say why not do it for mawlid also ? I assume you are referring to the mawlid of rabi-ul-awaal, and not the weekly mawlid of fasting on Mondays which is derived from the sunnah. 1. Mawlid of rabi-ul awaal started approx 600 ah. I don't think al ghazzli even has a view on the mawlid as it started after his time. 2. Even if Ghazzali had a pro-view on it, the issue of mawlid and laylatul Isra are worlds apart, becasue the mawlid of rabi-ul-awaal has no refererence from the ahadith, whereas layatul miraj does, as already shown. And how do you know what my view on mawlid is anyway, when I am not even sure about it myself?
	Quote