DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**horaAppagob** · 07-05-2011, 04:22 PM

oh yay!!!!

another "let's bash dr. zakir naik thread" fun, fun, fun!

seriously you people will attack dr. zakir naik for using the equivalent term of of "creator" and "sustainer" in ancient Sanskrit. some people really need to find more productive ways to spend their time or just take breaks from staring at their computer screens all day.

Didn't you even bother to watch the videos that I posted? All the Ulamaa of Ahlus Sunnah wal Jamaa'at have concensus on this issue that the Asmaa ul husna are Tawqeefiyyah - must be substantiated by the Divine Texts.

The name brahma might mean creator in sanskrit, but it is a name that is associated with an idol. Likewise with the names vishnu and shiva. I also made this point that Allaah says to the mushrikeen that the names of their idols have no authority. One of their idols which is mentioned is Uzza, which in Arabic means "mighty one". So according to Dr Zakir Naik's logic, there should be no problem with calling Allaah as "Uzza"? In Quraan, it is also mentioned how Sayyidina Ilyas

condemned his people who were worshiping an idol named Ba'al, which literally means "Lord". So again, according to Dr Zakir Naik's way of thinking, it is okay to call Allaah as Ba'al?

07-05-2011, 04:22 PM	#19
horaAppagob Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 575 Senior Member	oh yay!!!! another "let's bash dr. zakir naik thread" fun, fun, fun! seriously you people will attack dr. zakir naik for using the equivalent term of of "creator" and "sustainer" in ancient Sanskrit. some people really need to find more productive ways to spend their time or just take breaks from staring at their computer screens all day. Didn't you even bother to watch the videos that I posted? All the Ulamaa of Ahlus Sunnah wal Jamaa'at have concensus on this issue that the Asmaa ul husna are Tawqeefiyyah - must be substantiated by the Divine Texts. The name brahma might mean creator in sanskrit, but it is a name that is associated with an idol. Likewise with the names vishnu and shiva. I also made this point that Allaah says to the mushrikeen that the names of their idols have no authority. One of their idols which is mentioned is Uzza, which in Arabic means "mighty one". So according to Dr Zakir Naik's logic, there should be no problem with calling Allaah as "Uzza"? In Quraan, it is also mentioned how Sayyidina Ilyas condemned his people who were worshiping an idol named Ba'al, which literally means "Lord". So again, according to Dr Zakir Naik's way of thinking, it is okay to call Allaah as Ba'al?
	Quote