Here's a question. Is the work in Majmoo al-Fatawa not to be weighed with the remainder of his work? Because it's quite clear that a large amount of his work was dedicated to criticizing heavily well-known Sufis and practices with regards to Sufism during his time- such as the Friends of Allah and the Friends of Shaytaan; that work in particular is quite scathing and obviously directed at certain sufis. And then there's his (and others') takfeer of Ibn Arabi', who is regarded as 'al-Shaykh al-Akbar' by a great number of groups today. Then take into account his refusal to support any forms of dhikr not specifically (specifically, not implicitly) supported by the Qur'an and Sunnah... (an opinion shared by the Hanbali scholars, such as Ibn Rajab al-Hanbali (see Jami al-Uloom wal Hukam) and Ibn Qudama , see Ibn Qudama's opinion of hadras)... Taking all this into account, well, who exactly are the Sufis he praises, whose work can be seen and viewed today in a context free of additions? What Tariqa indeed would fit into Shaykh Ibn Taymiyyah's Sufism paradigm? I doubt very much that the ones nowadays would.