View Single Post
Old 06-01-2011, 07:09 AM   #10
BarBoss

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
577
Senior Member
Default
The verses are definately referring to the azwaaj at-taahiraat, but the ayat at-tat-hir was also referring to the ahl al-kisaa', as the others have said, hence the change in person: innama yureeduLlahu li yudh-hiba 'anKUM ar-rijsi, not 'ankunna, so it included the wives and the ahl al-kisaa'.
BarBoss is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:27 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity