View Single Post
Old 05-14-2011, 01:59 AM   #17
wbeachcomber

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
385
Senior Member
Default
Ibn Hazm's dhahihiri madh-hab does not represent ahl as-sunnah.

Ustadh Tripoly: I'm not sure if Imam Ja'far had a madh-hab in the sense of the 4 madha-hib. Rather, he had his own ijtihaadiyyaat in various shar'i matters, just like the rest of the a'immah of the salaf did. In fact, there wasn't a uniform method of ijtihad i.e. usul used by the Ahl al-Bayt; it is quite possible that Imam 'Ali Zayn al-'abidin and Imam Ja'far would have different opinions on a single matter. However, these opinions were not autentically preserved by a group of loyal students, unlike Imam Abu Hanfifah, for example, who had Imam Abu Yusuf and Imam Muhammad (the latter compiled the dhahir ar-riwaayah for us hanafis). This is why their madha-hib did not survive.

An interesting feature of the hanafi madh-hab is that it was largely based on the ijtihaad of sayyiduna 'AbduLlah b. Mas'ud, but also sayyiduna 'Ali radhiy Allah 'anhumaa, owing to its birth in the city of Kufa.

was-salam


I thought you were Shafi`?

Anyways, I know a lot of people are mentioning the Dhahiri Madhab being big in Andalus, but, as far as I know this isn't true, and, in fact, one of the reasons Ibn Hazm was so unpopular was because he was adamantly against the four Madhahib and trying to propagate an unpopular alternative.
wbeachcomber is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:00 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity