DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**23InetrySypekek** · 05-14-2011, 04:11 PM

Wahhabis mostly are hanbalis, and salafi in aqeedah..

Hanbalis are mostly wahhabi and salafi in aqeedah.

Some Salafis are not at all wahhabi/hanbali in fiqh.

So we can conclude that Salafi can be Aqeedah or fiqh which can sometimes be Ahl Hadeeth, Albani, Dhaahiri, Madhabi, Hanbali can be Aqeedah or fiqh Hanbali, and Wahhabi can usually be Aqeedah and fiqh Hanbali and maybe other then that..

In the context of the wahhabi hanbalis who follow ibn taymiyah (saudi) , they are hanbali because of my previous post regardless of whose iktiyaraat they do within the madhab.

In regards to lost madhhabs, I think some credit must be given to the Saudi ulama for their enormous contribution to Hanbali literature. If it was not for the Saudi ulama much of the hanbali legacy would have been lost.

I believe it was the king of Qatar who ordered a certain amount of Hanbali works to be edited and published.

05-14-2011, 04:11 PM	#36
23InetrySypekek Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 516 Senior Member	Wahhabis mostly are hanbalis, and salafi in aqeedah.. Hanbalis are mostly wahhabi and salafi in aqeedah. Some Salafis are not at all wahhabi/hanbali in fiqh. So we can conclude that Salafi can be Aqeedah or fiqh which can sometimes be Ahl Hadeeth, Albani, Dhaahiri, Madhabi, Hanbali can be Aqeedah or fiqh Hanbali, and Wahhabi can usually be Aqeedah and fiqh Hanbali and maybe other then that.. In the context of the wahhabi hanbalis who follow ibn taymiyah (saudi) , they are hanbali because of my previous post regardless of whose iktiyaraat they do within the madhab. In regards to lost madhhabs, I think some credit must be given to the Saudi ulama for their enormous contribution to Hanbali literature. If it was not for the Saudi ulama much of the hanbali legacy would have been lost. I believe it was the king of Qatar who ordered a certain amount of Hanbali works to be edited and published.
	Quote