[Theorsell]

Walaikum us salam,

Did you not SEE the video where the ISNAD was RECITED in the VIDEO in the link I posted?
Also for the Yusuf Nabhani quote, can you say which SCHOLAR lied in that report about the Hairs? If you can't, then you have to accept the report

And also in the link it says:
As mentioned in the book of Yousuf Al Nabhani (رحمة الله عليه) some hairs are noted as growing (photocopy of this page is included in this post). Others might be growing in slow phase or won’t grow at all. It is not at all under our control as Allah is the one who gives special growth pattern to those Hairs of Rasoolullah (صلى الله عليه وسلم)

I don’t think whether any of these controversy makers have ever seen any Sacred Hair. Let alone the one in Masjid Imam Husain in Cairo. Nor I feel they have the intention to see it at all. Who has measured actual length of the hair kept in Masjid Imam Husain?

It is noteworthy that another Sacred Hair in custody of another Shaikh in Abu Dhabi is also long. One of my friend who saw it had explained me about it. Regarding authenticity of the ‘Isnad’ one has to believe it otherwise proven wrong. It is evident that the hair kept in Al Khazraji’s collection of sacred relics is the most authentic as he maintains its full chain of custodians reaching to the era of Sahaba (رضي الله عنهم).

But, the outcry on this subject from non Ahlu Suunah wal Jamaa’h sects are because of one main reason as I understood. The core of the fact is that the Hair was handed over to a great Indian scholar of recent times who is very strong in his stand for Ahlu Suunah wal Jamaa’h. I have seen him as a sincere character in his efforts in propagating the religion, helping needy and especially upbringing thousands of orphans.

But many whose ideology doesn’t match with Ahlu Suunah wal Jamaa’h are against him as was the case for many past great scholars like Imam Ahmad bin Hambal (رضي الله عنه). The conspiracy makers wait for any chance to disgrace him to distract his public acceptance. Many of such controversies in past have ended up on the other way and he emerged victorious and his fame increased.

Now this immeasurable accolade of getting custody of Sacred Hair of Rasoolullah (صلى الله عليه وسلم) made him ever respectful. Meanwhile it has stirred the jealous opponents. Their envy is clear from the fuss and fury they publish filled with assumptions rather than realities and logic rather than evidences.

In this regard it is good for a believer to take the stance of Slaves of Rahman (عباد الرحمن) mentioned in Surah al Furqan verse 63 “And the servants of (Allah) Most Gracious are those who walk on the earth in humility, and when the ignorant address them, they say, Peace!;”
Another comment:
I think that there’s other points that are possible like maybe if the person is pious and possesses the Hair, then its grows more. Or that if there’s a lot of Hairs together, they grow faster.
Allahu A’lem And it is possible that Allah is showing such miracles in todays times instead of before, so that people's Iman increases and people believe in miracles, as Sheikh Ya'qoubi said similar.
As for the shadow and the picture, it might just be a picture problem or that something else is giving the shadow or that the camera caused it. That's shown by the observation that the shadow doesn't follow the shape of the Hairs (like it doesn't go down like the hairs do, nor are they bent in the shadow) Allahu A'lem. The hairs I got checked are different and I'm sure about them because one of the brothers wanted to BRING it and get it checked by the SCIENTISTS at a university last year that I know of so that the scientists can be convinced of it and try whatever explanation they can. You can go and ask those who possess such hairs and see for yourself about the shadow. Although the Arabic article I linked to before also gives a similar test about the shadow. And I couldn't find the picture you linked to there.

There is said to be prophet's hair in some parts of the world, including Bal masjid in Kashmir.. which has only a small strand of hair, why hasn't that reported to have grown even a single bit even after all these years ? and only hair with in the custody of khasraji grows ?
Have you checked the hair out there and measured it? Have you asked the people who look after it if it grows there in Kashmir?
Also its NOT just the hair with the khasraji that grows, but a lot of others. Clearly you aren't reading the articles/comments posted before, or you have something that obstructs you from reading them?

In fact the Bal Masjid Hair also has miraculous qualities reported in historical sources similar to mentioned previously. You should have read this before denying what you don't know:
http://www.islamicvoice.com/february.99/features.htm

On acquiring the sacred hair, Ashawari left along with the holy relic for Kashmir via Lahore. In the meantime, news reached Aurangzeb that Ashawari was in the possession of the holy relic. Aurangzeb ordered that the holy relic be brought to the royal court along with Ashawari. The emperor took the holy relic from Ashawari, and sought the confirmation of its authenticity from his spiritual guide, Hazrat Abu Saleh. After having tested the authenticity of the holy relic, Abu Saleh declared that the sacred hair was indeed that of the Prophet (Pbuh). Apart from this, Aurangzeb made other tests to confirm its authenticity. He exposed the sacred hair to sunlight but it did not cast a shadow on the earth. He then exposed it to fire, but there was no effect on it. Finally, the sacred hair was placed on a sheet of paper laced with honey, but not a single insect touched it. Satisfied with its genuineness, Aurangzeb ordered that the holy relic be enshrined in Ajmer Sharif, at the dargah of Khwaja Moinuddin Chishti.
In fact I have communicated with the author of the article who went through different historical documents about this.

Iam not denying the companions used to seek baraka from the hair, iam questioning the authenticity of hairs which are popping around here and there nowadays and questioning those who equate it to kufr who doubt its authenticity, Iam questioning people trying to build big money making business around it.
I agree that people need isnads to authenticate such things, or have other authentication techniques like Shah Wali Ullah's incident. And I oppose the money used for such things.

As for your accusations against Sheikh Aboobaker of Kerala, it's probably based on the wahabi here:
http://articles.timesofindia.indiati...slamic-scholar
And as you can see there, it says "We've nothing to hide. So we invited the SKSSF office bearers to inspect our records and satisfy themselves, but they have not visited yet. The relic was handed over to Kanthapuram Musaliar at the 33rd annual conference of the Markaz last February by none other than Sheikh Khazraji, who heads the 'Aukaf' (religious department) in the Dubai government. We also have the 'sanad', a certificate to attest the ancestry and truth of the relic," Buhari, adding, "Their problem is not the hair, but the mosque. They are scared of our appeal and influence."



Pity you accused Sheikh Muhammed Khazraji of fraud, though he's a notable scholar, see:
http://www.epa.ae/philately/Philatel...extFile=Y0712T

You'll be responsible to Allah for your flimsy accusations against different shuyukh, including the ones of Kerala (it seems your jealous because of your sectarian beliefs and that numerous shuyukh from worldwide came to honour the Sheikh of Kerala).