DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**Theorsell** · 04-25-2011, 07:26 PM

Wa salam,
Well you did say its "fake" which is an accusation. And your accusation is against the whole of the khasraji family if you see before. Plus Sheikh Muhammed is included because it's he who passed the hairs to Sheikh Ahmed. And both are shuyukh.
Well if it isn't a flaw with the picture, not the mention the fact that I couldn't find the picture in any of the links so I'm not sure if its related to the hairs., then the other explanation is quite possible.
That explanation is the one mentioned before that its accepted that SOME of the hairs grow, etc. That means that its possible that only SOME of the hairs would have shadows. Its entirely up to Allah.
Can you provide a link for the picture so I can see where you've got it from?
Now scriptures force us to accept authenticated miracles of the Prophets and Awliya. In this case its about the Prophet, thus we HAVE to accept authenticated miracles. But if you're doubtful, you have no right to go and say hairs are fake without evidence.
If you think the hairs are fake, go and disprove the sanad recited in the video.

But lets sake that is true for the sake of argument, if according to you and the article you quoted it should be growing and splitting and then again growing and splitting and they should all be ridiculously long since according to the article.. " The Shaikh tells that some hairs in his collection grow 1.7 to 2.5% in a year " thats 1400yrs x 2.5% (or bet it even 1.7)
do your math, that should be even ridiculously longer than what was shown in the picture.
There is a serious flaw to your logic. You first accept that the hairs split after they reach a certain length, thus the hairs multiply and the length is limited. Then you say that they should be much longer, implying that they would reach a mile or so. A contradiction in arguments.

its from the set of photographs along with the one which you saw in the link to arabic page I checked the link many times and searched the internet but couldn't find the picture you pasted. What is the source of the picture?

04-25-2011, 07:26 PM	#15
Theorsell Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 512 Senior Member	Wa salam, Well you did say its "fake" which is an accusation. And your accusation is against the whole of the khasraji family if you see before. Plus Sheikh Muhammed is included because it's he who passed the hairs to Sheikh Ahmed. And both are shuyukh. Well if it isn't a flaw with the picture, not the mention the fact that I couldn't find the picture in any of the links so I'm not sure if its related to the hairs., then the other explanation is quite possible. That explanation is the one mentioned before that its accepted that SOME of the hairs grow, etc. That means that its possible that only SOME of the hairs would have shadows. Its entirely up to Allah. Can you provide a link for the picture so I can see where you've got it from? Now scriptures force us to accept authenticated miracles of the Prophets and Awliya. In this case its about the Prophet, thus we HAVE to accept authenticated miracles. But if you're doubtful, you have no right to go and say hairs are fake without evidence. If you think the hairs are fake, go and disprove the sanad recited in the video. But lets sake that is true for the sake of argument, if according to you and the article you quoted it should be growing and splitting and then again growing and splitting and they should all be ridiculously long since according to the article.. " The Shaikh tells that some hairs in his collection grow 1.7 to 2.5% in a year " thats 1400yrs x 2.5% (or bet it even 1.7) do your math, that should be even ridiculously longer than what was shown in the picture. There is a serious flaw to your logic. You first accept that the hairs split after they reach a certain length, thus the hairs multiply and the length is limited. Then you say that they should be much longer, implying that they would reach a mile or so. A contradiction in arguments. its from the set of photographs along with the one which you saw in the link to arabic page I checked the link many times and searched the internet but couldn't find the picture you pasted. What is the source of the picture?
	Quote