DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post - Some issues with Husaam al haramayn and Original Texts of Deobandi Kutubs

**searkibia** · 01-11-2011, 01:30 PM

I'll let Mawlana Qasim Nanautwi reply to your question:

"There is no possibility of another Nabi coming after Rasulullaah and I regard as a Kaafir any person who doubts this." (Munaazarah Ajeebiyyah Pg. 103)

If someone read my question, and read your and read Maulana Qasim nanotavis answer, they will conclude both of you have difficulty in understanding the question, or you have difficulty in reading urdu, or understanding it.

You should read this part carefully:

* Muhal ko agar farz keeya jahay toh farz kernay say joh nateeja nikalta heh us ko biyaan keeya jata heh.

Implication of which is:

* Suppose of a angel because human being, he will look like a human being.

It would be illogical, and ignorance of linguistics:

* suppose if a angel was to become a human being he would look like angles.

And if someone was to ask question:

* suppose if angel was to becme human being, would he look like angel or human?

And if someone was to answer that presupposed question with:

* If angel was to become human being, then he will still look like angel.

or he was to answer it:

* There is no possibility of angel becoming human being, and i regard anyone crazy who beleives it can happen.

We will know, the status of knowledge of such person, and question his sanity. A Presupposed scenario requires answer based on the scenario actually is taking place, even though its a supposition.

* Suppose if a man was planning to jump from a house to commit suicide, and you had a big soft cushy matress will yu place it under the place where he was planing to fall to death?

Answer one: if that was to happen i would palce it in place where he was planing to land to death.

Answer two: it would happened, and anyone who beleives it could, he is crazy, its just a supposition.

You are just embrassing your self with none-sense. I recogmend let the Maulana Abu Hajira represent your side of things, he is more educated, and alot more intelligent, and would not make a fool of his side {i.e. Deobandi}. All you are doing is making your side of things look bad, very bad, and if you are trying to paint a rosey and flowery image of Deobandi side, so far you only painting a picture which shows STUPIDITY.

There is nothing which you will quote from Maulana Qasim Nanotavi which i have not already understood, and before you get high might, try to understand FIRST 30 LINES of Tazir Un Naas, and trust me, you wont be able to, I read Tazir Un Naas, and have even wrote little sharh on it. Tazir Un Naas is not for hallow skull people, reasoning is complex, requires good knowledge of logic, philsophical reasonin, and Kalam. And you need to know language Urdu, inside out, your college grade urdu isnt good enough to understand that book.

And for you to get into dicussion with me about Tazir Un Naas is like you debating about grammar of Shakespear with your limited knowledge of English. So dont act smarter then you are.

01-11-2011, 01:30 PM	#29
searkibia Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 554 Senior Member	I'll let Mawlana Qasim Nanautwi reply to your question: "There is no possibility of another Nabi coming after Rasulullaah and I regard as a Kaafir any person who doubts this." (Munaazarah Ajeebiyyah Pg. 103) If someone read my question, and read your and read Maulana Qasim nanotavis answer, they will conclude both of you have difficulty in understanding the question, or you have difficulty in reading urdu, or understanding it. You should read this part carefully: * Muhal ko agar farz keeya jahay toh farz kernay say joh nateeja nikalta heh us ko biyaan keeya jata heh. Implication of which is: * Suppose of a angel because human being, he will look like a human being. It would be illogical, and ignorance of linguistics: * suppose if a angel was to become a human being he would look like angles. And if someone was to ask question: * suppose if angel was to becme human being, would he look like angel or human? And if someone was to answer that presupposed question with: * If angel was to become human being, then he will still look like angel. or he was to answer it: * There is no possibility of angel becoming human being, and i regard anyone crazy who beleives it can happen. We will know, the status of knowledge of such person, and question his sanity. A Presupposed scenario requires answer based on the scenario actually is taking place, even though its a supposition. * Suppose if a man was planning to jump from a house to commit suicide, and you had a big soft cushy matress will yu place it under the place where he was planing to fall to death? Answer one: if that was to happen i would palce it in place where he was planing to land to death. Answer two: it would happened, and anyone who beleives it could, he is crazy, its just a supposition. You are just embrassing your self with none-sense. I recogmend let the Maulana Abu Hajira represent your side of things, he is more educated, and alot more intelligent, and would not make a fool of his side {i.e. Deobandi}. All you are doing is making your side of things look bad, very bad, and if you are trying to paint a rosey and flowery image of Deobandi side, so far you only painting a picture which shows STUPIDITY. There is nothing which you will quote from Maulana Qasim Nanotavi which i have not already understood, and before you get high might, try to understand FIRST 30 LINES of Tazir Un Naas, and trust me, you wont be able to, I read Tazir Un Naas, and have even wrote little sharh on it. Tazir Un Naas is not for hallow skull people, reasoning is complex, requires good knowledge of logic, philsophical reasonin, and Kalam. And you need to know language Urdu, inside out, your college grade urdu isnt good enough to understand that book. And for you to get into dicussion with me about Tazir Un Naas is like you debating about grammar of Shakespear with your limited knowledge of English. So dont act smarter then you are.
	Quote