DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post - Ashraf 'Ali Thanvi: Salaf took literal meaning of sifaat

**vipBrooriErok** · 11-12-2010, 09:39 PM

Either way, the words " کنہ کو مفوض للعلم الٰہی کرتے ہیں ،اور کوئی کیفیت متعین نہیں کرتے" actually destroys the anthropomorphous belief of present day pseudo-salafis, who actually take it as their own parts. Maulana Thanvi Rahimahullah has denounced the claim of the mushabbiha further down. So I don't know what the purpose of posting the fatwa was.

BTW, Masha'Allah I like the a'daab of brother Tawheed when he's addressing the Ulama. I wonder how long will it take for me to get banned from a pseudo-salafi forum if I write Nasir Albani or Muhammad bin Abdul Wahab Najdi.

Please do not let his lack of adab drag you down the same line

In anycase, the risalah is not as straight forward as you have mentioned. In fact I have so far read the first half of the risalah probably 3 times. I have to say its a brilliant piece thus far. In fact Maulana clearly shatters the incorrect assertion from both parties. Please read the part about salafiya and khalafiya (these are his attribution or rather groups attributing themselves wrongfully)...

The explanation of kunh which comes approx 3 or 4 pages later is marvellous.. I just wish someone could translate this piece.

11-12-2010, 09:39 PM	#9
vipBrooriErok Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 381 Senior Member	Either way, the words " کنہ کو مفوض للعلم الٰہی کرتے ہیں ،اور کوئی کیفیت متعین نہیں کرتے" actually destroys the anthropomorphous belief of present day pseudo-salafis, who actually take it as their own parts. Maulana Thanvi Rahimahullah has denounced the claim of the mushabbiha further down. So I don't know what the purpose of posting the fatwa was. BTW, Masha'Allah I like the a'daab of brother Tawheed when he's addressing the Ulama. I wonder how long will it take for me to get banned from a pseudo-salafi forum if I write Nasir Albani or Muhammad bin Abdul Wahab Najdi. Please do not let his lack of adab drag you down the same line In anycase, the risalah is not as straight forward as you have mentioned. In fact I have so far read the first half of the risalah probably 3 times. I have to say its a brilliant piece thus far. In fact Maulana clearly shatters the incorrect assertion from both parties. Please read the part about salafiya and khalafiya (these are his attribution or rather groups attributing themselves wrongfully)... The explanation of kunh which comes approx 3 or 4 pages later is marvellous.. I just wish someone could translate this piece.
	Quote