DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post - Ashraf 'Ali Thanvi: Salaf took literal meaning of sifaat

**doogiehoussi** · 11-23-2010, 12:30 AM

sorry my mistake.. Not salaf or khalaf rather deobandies as pointed out from the your own quotation. The object of the thread you created was NOT to discuss akhi. Why cant you own up to that. It was to gloat about some finding you came across thinking it supports the salafi athari creed. while the whole risalah is establishing the salaf creed of making tafweed in both kunh as well as kayf.

You did not portray the whole picture. He said Salaf took the literal meaning of sifaat. Which goes against the kalamist ash'ari/maturidi aqeedah.

And at the same time establishing the athari creed as a part of khalaf (i.e ahl ta'weel) NOT salaf! Please wake up and smell the coffee. If you cannot understand that from the risalah then your understanding is deficient, and thats not my problem.

Thats why i said in the begining that its a mixture of right and wrong. You should take a bath to wake up akhil kareem

In anycase, I do not wish to discuss since I feel you are being unreasonable in your intent of this thread. Your purpose and your inciting comments like the one below expose your intent. Why should I entertain you in your endeavor?

Its your choice. Mine was a response to your comment, like this:

Your raising this concern even after reading the risalah and understanding it shows that that either you didnt understand it, or are trying to incite the discussion on something which is not there. I can further help this much that I will scan those suplementary writeups and post them as well. So no one can say that deobandies are hiding something.

JazakAllah again.

11-23-2010, 12:30 AM	#29
doogiehoussi Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 534 Senior Member	sorry my mistake.. Not salaf or khalaf rather deobandies as pointed out from the your own quotation. The object of the thread you created was NOT to discuss akhi. Why cant you own up to that. It was to gloat about some finding you came across thinking it supports the salafi athari creed. while the whole risalah is establishing the salaf creed of making tafweed in both kunh as well as kayf. You did not portray the whole picture. He said Salaf took the literal meaning of sifaat. Which goes against the kalamist ash'ari/maturidi aqeedah. And at the same time establishing the athari creed as a part of khalaf (i.e ahl ta'weel) NOT salaf! Please wake up and smell the coffee. If you cannot understand that from the risalah then your understanding is deficient, and thats not my problem. Thats why i said in the begining that its a mixture of right and wrong. You should take a bath to wake up akhil kareem In anycase, I do not wish to discuss since I feel you are being unreasonable in your intent of this thread. Your purpose and your inciting comments like the one below expose your intent. Why should I entertain you in your endeavor? Its your choice. Mine was a response to your comment, like this: Your raising this concern even after reading the risalah and understanding it shows that that either you didnt understand it, or are trying to incite the discussion on something which is not there. I can further help this much that I will scan those suplementary writeups and post them as well. So no one can say that deobandies are hiding something. JazakAllah again.
	Quote