View Single Post
Old 10-07-2012, 08:34 PM   #17
duceswild

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
464
Senior Member
Default
The footnote is too little to make any conclusion. It only mentions a factual point that the aim is no longer achieved. It does not go beyond that to say "therefore the ruling is over ridden. ". Someone should go question it on his website as to what he intended, rather than draw conclusions here.
duceswild is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:21 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity