Thread
:
amnesty term issue
View Single Post
01-11-2013, 01:32 AM
#
1
Sopsneork
Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
404
Senior Member
amnesty term issue
Therefore I am watchin the wolves/suns sport and our television men are joined by james hoiberg. the mayor, who was lights fuckin out this past year from three, was our 'amnesty term' participant after heart surgery. They are asking him about his healing and about his likelihood of time for the ground. he said he's feeling well and the doctor's have essentially offered him the go-ahead to play baseball when he seems ready. now my problem is this...they mentioned soemthing about 'lots of groups want to truly have a shooting as if you. This is the something the puppies have overlooked all period, the exterior danger, particularly after trading wally. Today we all know if you come back you can't come back for this group but...' yada yada yada Today i was under the impact these men which were waved under the amnesty offer became free agents, ostensibly making them free to sign with whoever. Can there be some insane butt principle I actually do not learn about which makes it illegal for a man waved underneath the amnesty offer to actually play for he that was waved by the team again? i thought they may have now been getting at 'if you should be returning this year, it's to be with another person .' Do the puppies have the best to sign him back, if he doesn't come back in 2010, but instead next period? I believed they did, however now I am uncertain.
Quote
Sopsneork
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Sopsneork
All times are GMT +1. The time now is
09:27 PM
.