Thread: 9/11 questions
View Single Post
Old 05-02-2007, 03:00 AM   #48
johnsonjunior

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
522
Senior Member
Default
Willie Brown warning

I urge anyone following this thread to read both news articles. Mine is the original news article and the one Rhandhular posted isn't much different. It just tries to play it down and not make look as suspicious to having prior knowledge.

my article. the first one presented to the public.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...2/MN229389.DTL

Rhandhular article
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...AGG9L4KI81.DTL

Directly from the article Rhandhular posted

What the mayor got from his source was a warning that Americans should be concerned about traveling.

Willie being Willie, he paid no attention -- and was actually waiting for his ride to the airport when he turned on the TV and, like millions of other Americans, watched as the World Trade Center crumbled.

Exactly how the warning popped up remains a mystery to this day.

It might have had something to do with a little-noticed State Department memo issued a week before that went out in a routine press briefing -- and that former Secretary of State George Shultz himself received -- warning that Americans may be the target of an attack from extremist groups "with links to Osama bin Laden's al Qaeda organization."

The warning, however, dealt primarily with U.S. military bases in Japan and South Korea -- clearly the wrong targets.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
The only warning they could think of without down right accusing the Gov't of prior knowledge to 9/11 was to say this might have been in regard to a memo from last week that dealt with military bases in in Janp and S.K. Mayor Willie brown was set to travel to NYC not JAPAN and South Korea.

Rhandhular says case closed???????????????????
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

WTC7.
are you telling me this picture http://www.911myths.com/html/wtc7_damage.html is the smoking gun as to why the building fell at free fall speed straight down??? It seems kind of weird that such Massive peices of steel and concrete were projected such long ranges at such high speeds to be able to cause such damage in the first place. It wasn't too long ago that they were still finding Bone fragments of Victims on near by roof tops. floors simply colapsing? or indications of explosive devices?

Even if there is damage like I said, that doesn't mean it would fall and this damage would make the building topple if anything. NOT fall straight down in 7 seconds. This is why "popular mechanics experts" can't even come up with a fake plausible explanation to the manner in which it fell and why it was also left out of the 9/11 commision report.

again, watch all the videos I posted. watch the fire fighters casually telling people to get back the building is going to ""blow"". Not Collapse but "blow".

Watch Silverstein say they MADE THE DECISION TO PULL IT AND WATCH THE BUILDING COLLAPSE". Please Post the whole video of Silverstein and see if the implication is different. He later tried to clarify after the fact when eye brows were being raised and he realized the magnitude of his statement. He then said that he meant to Pull fire fighters out. It sure sounded to me like he said "pull it" not "pull them out".

Kerry's exact words from the clip

"I do know that that wall, I remember, was in danger and I think they made the decision based on the danger that it had in destroying other things-- that they did it in a controlled fashion."

Kerry would blow the whistle on bush? LOL are you kidding Me? They are both members of Skull and bones and cousins to the Royal blood line. You obviously have no understanding of Secret Societies, Occult knowledge, and Occult history of this World.

as far as Alex Jones, It is Ok for you to post information from Popular Mechanics and say its credible but I can use no links from Prison Planet or alex jones? The information on this page was statements made by Firefighters and had links to interviews done inNYC on a Talk Show straight out the witenesses mouths (AUDIO), which had nothing to do with Alex Jones. What makes him so uncredible anyway? Are the hundreds of engineers,pilots and scientists who are part of the Scholars for 911 truth unworthey too?

Look at this video several times of the WTC7 colapse. Does this really look like something that happened from Fire? or damaged corner that was scoped out?
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...collapse&hl=en

video comparison of a building that stood a blaze for 17 hours.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GEPjOi2dQSM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
47 internal columns. Lets not play word games here about who is calling who a liar.
FACT: WTC had 47 massive internal support columns that ran through the core of the building and the Commision Report does not even mention them, let alone state how they fell.

Here is another Good Vidoe:
Chief NIST engineer John Gross denies the existence of molten steel at Ground Zero despite testimony of ground zero workers, video footage of the lava like substance, and Nasa Thermal Imaging. Workers say some of these pools burned until December. Did Jet Fuel cause this?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JR7_9QgAb-I
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 1.jpg (25.6 KB, 2 views)
Last edited by Conan21; 05-02-2007 at 07:10 AM.


johnsonjunior is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:06 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity